<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Zen of living constitutionalism (another response to Jack)</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/19/the-zen-of-living-constitutionalism-another-response-to-jack.aspx</link><description>[Dahlia Lithwick] Jack I am well aware that wading into a constitutional tussle with Jack Balkin is a lot like going hunting with Dick Cheney but I want to push back a little on your “living constitution” post . First, thanks for the kind words. Second,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>