<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Binary Executive, cont'd</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/18/the-binary-executive-cont-d.aspx</link><description>[Adam White] Dawn, you seemed to misunderstand my argument when you ascribed to me the position that "we can have constitutional entities not squarely in one of the three constitutional boxes." In the first part of my argument , I tried to make clear</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>