<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Binary Executive?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/17/the-binary-eexecutive.aspx</link><description>We already knew that Vice President Cheney was comfortable arguing that his office was not part of the ... well ... the executive branch. In arguing that an executive order covering the executive branch did not apply to the vice president, he seemed to</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>