<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Supreme Court Backs Business Interests; Dog Bites Man</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/16/supreme-court-backs-business-interests-dog-bites-man.aspx</link><description>Jeffrey Rosen reminds us that the contemporary Supreme Court has been remarkably friendly to business interests. It is good to have an account of this in the popular press every now and then, and no one is more deft than Rosen in telling the story. But</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>