-
As we segue to
May, the month set aside to mark Better Sleep, Good Car Care, Photography, Salad, Eggs, and Barbecue—I kid you not—let's end April's
Convictions Poetry Slam with one last post on law and poetry.
Turns out it's the subject of
Law and Poetry, 11 Roger Wms. L. Rev. 353 (2006), by
Edward J. Eberle and
Bernhard Grossfeld, law professors at Roger Williams and Universität Münster, respectively. In addition to discussing some of the questions that
Kenji and
I explored, the article includes a number of passages mentioned here this month. To talk of Justice Harry A.
Blackmun and baseball and of Chief Justice William H.
Rehnquist and the flag, the authors add Ninth Circuit Judge
Stephen Reinhardt's
quotation of the anti-lynching ballad
Strange Fruit in n.14 of his dissent in a capital punishment case. The article continues with many more examples of ways that law influences poetry and that poetry influences law. I leave you with one such quote, from "Variations on Variations on a Theme" by
Lawrence Joseph, a St. John's law professor:
And that's the law. To bring to light
most hidden depths. The juror screaming
defendant's the devil staring at her
making her insane. The intense strain
phrasing the truth, the whole truth, nothing
but sentences, endless sentences.
-
I tend to agree with Kenji that the overt
mixing
of poetry and law can be ill-advised: adding the former often will
not enhance analysis in the latter. Yet the deployment of poetry – or any
literary reference, for that matter – serves to reveal something about the
legal writer who deploys it. Justice Harry A.
Blackmun's homage to Casey
at the Bat, no less than Chief Justice William H.
Rehnquist's tribute to
Barbara Frietchie in the 1st flag-burning case, told much about each
author's approach to the subject matter at bar. Some observers may not welcome
what is revealed; these 2 examples, for instance, might be seen as evidence that
a Justice lacked detachment and thus engaged in less than rational reasoning.
(That conclusion is not inevitable – consider those studies that refute the
commonly held assumption that emotion clouds jurors' judgment.) Adding
literature to law may serve, moreover, to make more humanly accessible a process
seldom understood by those humans whom it most affects.
Kenji's right, too, that the
best
law poetry may be those lines that we commit to memory not because of some
intentionally catchy cadence, but rather because their simplicity belies a
deeper social meaning. The warnings set forth in
Miranda
v. Arizona surely qualify. Another nominee jumps to mind. It is the
essence of another opinion by Chief Justice Earl Warren, a line on which
Brown v. Board of
Education and all its progeny depend. If I may be indulged a bit of
verse, it is:
Separate
educational facilities
are
inherently unequal.
As for
W., the
verbal contributions that Kenji cites link this President with another
W. besides Shakespeare. To this ear, the inestimable "
misunderestimate"
inevitably recalls "
normalcy,"
the once-abnormal word for which America owes a debt to President
Warren G.
Harding.
-
Today's Poetry Month nominee represents the most straightforward of the Slam's categories: No. 1, "
use of poetry in legal writing, by judges, lawyers, or legal scholars." Waxing poetic is the late Supreme Court Justice
Harry A. Blackmun, a lifelong National League fan. Blackmun's 1972 pæan to baseball,
Flood v. Kuhn, included a famous footnote 4:
Millions have known and enjoyed baseball. One writer knowledgeable in the field of sports almost assumed that everyone did until, one day, he discovered otherwise:
"I knew a cove who'd never heard of Washington and Lee,"
"Of Caesar and Napoleon from the ancient jamboree,"
"But, bli'me, there are queerer things than anything like that,"
"For here's a cove who never heard of 'Casey at the Bat'!"
"* * * *"
"Ten million never heard of Keats, or Shelley, Burns or Poe;"
"But they know 'the air was shattered by the force of Casey's blow';"
"They never heard of Shakespeare, nor of Dickens, like as not,"
"But they know the somber drama from old Mudville's haunted lot."
"He never heard of Casey! Am I dreaming? Is it true?"
"Is fame but windblown ashes when the summer day is through?"
"Does greatness fade so quickly and is grandeur doomed to die"
"That bloomed in early morning, ere the dusk rides down the sky?"
—"He Never Heard of Casey" Grantland Rice, The Sportlight, New York Herald Tribune, June 1, 1926, p. 23.
Blackmun's equally famous Footnote 5 continued in-verse, quoting the "Tinkers to Evers to Chance" refrain from Franklin Pierce Adams' "Baseball's Sad Lexicon."
In all, a boldly boyish use of poetry in legal reasoning.
To the rest of the Convictions team and all those in our virtual stands: Batter Up.
-
Kudos to Berkeley 2L Josh Keesan for rising to the challenge of nominating "law poetry" for the National Poetry Month-long Convictions Poetry Slam announced yesterday. Josh's entry fits neatly within Slam example No. 2, "poems about law or about law's effect on society." It's "Law Like Love," written by W.H. Auden, the poet who was born in England in 1907, became a U.S. citizen after serving in the Spanish Civil War, and died in Vienna in 1973.
The full poem, perhaps a wee bit long for a blog, can be read here (along with a great comment thereafter). Let me proffer a few choice stanzas:
Law is the wisdom of the old,
The impotent grandfathers feebly scold;
The grandchildren put out a treble tongue,
Law is the senses of the young.
....
Law, says the judge as he looks down his nose,
Speaking clearly and most severely,
Law is as I've told you before,
Law is as you know I suppose,
Law is but let me explain it once more,
Law is The Law.
....
Although I can at least confine
Your vanity and mine
To stating timidly
A timid similarity,
We shall boast anyway:
Like love I say.
Like love we don't know where or why,
Like love we can't compel or fly,
Like love we often weep,
Like love we seldom keep.
Great stuff, Josh; thanks. The erstwhile-student-of-Sherman-Act-remedies-in-me loves the "treble tongue" metaphor. Now: Who among my fellow Convicted is ready to take from Josh the Poetry Slam baton?
-
Today begins National Poetry Month, no foolin'. Given concerns voiced here about the blindering of America's lawyers, how about honoring this "cruellest month" with a Convictions Poetry Slam? Let's hear nominations for best, or worst, law poetry. By "law poetry" I mean:
- use of poetry in legal writing, by judges, lawyers, or legal scholars
- poems about law, or about law's effect on society
- passages of prose that, intentionally or not, are poetic
To mark the month over at IntLawGrrls I reprinted America by Gertrude Stein. With effort that poem might be shoehorned into example No. 2. But it's not a great fit, and in any event I'd rather kick off our slam with this snippet, representing example No. 3:
The facts of this
case
are, we must
hope,
extraordinary.
Michael H. v. Gerald D. (1989), by Antonin Scalia
More to come as the month unfolds; looking forward to your entries.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?