Saturday, March 22, 2008 - Posts
-
Eric , you changed the topic on me and perhaps misunderstood. The conversation was about the politics of abortion and Republican coalition--no one is questioning the sincerity of belief of many who would like to see Roe overruled and abortion banned. Read More...
-
Benjamin and Emily appear to agree that, as he puts it, "[ t]o the extent the eventual convictions of KSM et al rely on coerced testimony, even indirectly,... the Defense Department should not put them to death ." But should the prospect of execution Read More...
-
Dawn, you've hit the nail on the head . What hypocrites! To think that we would believe that they are against abortion just because they are trying to shut down abortion clinics. I hadn't realized that their nefarious scheme is to increase the number Read More...
-
Columbia business professor Ray Fisman has a fascinating column in Slate on the economics of California's "three strikes" law -- a subject near to my heart because I wrote my undergraduate thesis on it. Researchers at RAND have done some work on the costs, Read More...
-
[Dawn Johnsen] With apologies for the more-than-24-hour response time - an eternity for a blog, I know - I want to resurrect Eric's statement : "Members of the Republican coalition are not so much concerned about Roe as about reducing the number of abortions." Read More...
-
[Adam White] Justice Clarence Thomas is the featured interview in the weekend edition of the Wall Street Journal . He's interviewed by David Rivkin and Lee Casey, a pair of prominent lawyers who do a fair share of writing on the side . (Our editor, Phil, Read More...
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?