-
Posted
Monday, March 31, 2008 9:13 AM
| By
Marty Lederman
Eric Lichtblau, in an excerpt
from his forthcoming book, confirms that the NSA wiretapping program
was operated beneath an unprecedented and remarkable veil of secrecy.
He confirms Jack Goldsmith's earlier testimony
that the Deputy Attorneys General (Larry Thompson and then Jim Comey)
were not permitted to be read into the program and, more astonishingly
still, that the lawyers at the NSA itself were not permitted to see the
John Yoo-penned legal opinions that provided the basis for the program
the NSA was operating! (I can't even imagine what those meetings looked
like: "No, really -- you guys do
have the legal authority to secretly violate FISA; but we can't show
you the legal theory why that's the case. Just trust us." And the NSA
responded: "Oh, in that case, ok, we'll get right on it." Huh?)
The
story also appears to confirm that the original Yoo legal theory was in
effect that the President could disregard any laws he wished in
deciding how to surveille al Qaeda. How often have we heard this?: "[Yoo's Opinion] was revised in 2004 by a new cast of senior lawyers at the Justice Department, who found the earlier opinion incomplete and somewhat shoddy, leaving out important case law on presidential powers."
I
don't think there's much more to be said about this that many of us
have not already said multiple times over -- except that it remains
scandalous that the Congress would even consider the Administration's
requests for new legislation until the Administration has made public
the entire set of OLC opinions on this issue and interrogation
techniques, etc. (redacted, of course, to protect secret NSA
technological capabilities). Congress has quite a bit of leverage here;
they simply seem unwilling to use it.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?