No, We Are NOT in a Climate “Pause”

The entire universe in blog form
Nov. 5 2013 7:45 AM

No, We Are NOT in a Climate “Pause”

zombie
Slaying the zombie denier claims, nonsense which doesn't seem to die.

Photo by Anton Brand/Shutterstock

Last week, I posted about ten failed climate change denial arguments. It was a video made by Hank Green and does a great job slapping down some of the ridiculous claims you still see polluting newspaper editorial pages and denial blogs (for examples, see here and here and here).

One argument Hank brings up (at the 1:44 mark), and one I’ve hammered on a few times as well, is this idea that we’re in some sort of global warming pause. This is a claim that gets some traction, because when you look at land surface temperatures over the past few years, they haven’t gone up as quickly as they have in the past.

Advertisement

However, using this measurement to claim that global warming has stopped, or even just paused, is wrong. The good folks at NASA Goddard recently posted a video interview with climate scientist Josh Willis to put this claim to rest:

I like it; it’s quick, breezy, and hits the high notes. But I’d like to add my own $0.02 to it here.

The bottom line is: No, we are not seeing a pause in global warming. Here’s the graph that’s causing so much grief:

land and seat temperatures
Land sea surface temperature anomalies since 1850.

Graph from the IPCC AR5 report

This plot shows the land and sea surface temperature “anomalies”, that is, deviations from an average (in this case, the temperatures averaged from 1961 – 1990). When you look at just the past few years — way up there to the upper right — you see the ocean and land surface temperatures fluctuating, but more-or-less staying flat. However, when you look at the whole schmeer, it’s obvious that the much larger and far more obvious trend is an increase. There have been many such “pauses” before — mostly due to short-term effects like La Niña — but over time the temperatures go up, up, up.

A far better way to look at that plot is to average it over decade timescales. When you do, you get this:

ipcc_ar5_decadal_tempavg
The same plot as above, averaged over ten year bins.

Graph from the IPCC report

And that makes things a lot more clear.

And even then, surface temperatures (land and/or ocean) are not the best way to measure global warming! Surface temperatures are one small part of a much larger system that includes the atmosphere and deep oceans. And, it turns out, the oceans play a major role, the key role here: They are where the extra heat from global warming is going. About 90 percent of it, in fact.

This is not a guess, an excuse, or an attempt to obfuscate. It’s the simple truth. Temperature measurements of the ocean show it getting warmer. The sea level is rising steadily, and has been for decades — this is due to loss of ice in Antarctica and Greenland, as you might expect, but it’s also due to thermal expansion; literally, warm water expands.

globalwarmingoceans
Where is global warming going? Into the oceans, overwhelmingly.

Illustration from Skeptical Science

The process is relatively simple: The oceans are absorbing much of the energy from global warming, that warmth is causing the water to expand, and the sea levels are going up. This is how we know the oceans are absorbing that extra heat; we can measure it directly via temperature increase, and it’s causing gross physical changes in the level of the water.

Phil Plait Phil Plait

Phil Plait writes Slate’s Bad Astronomy blog and is an astronomer, public speaker, science evangelizer, and author of Death From the Skies!  

Not only that, but we see the effect on marine life. As the oceans absorb more carbon dioxide, the water acidifies. We see mass coral bleaching due to this acidification, and effects on phytoplankton, the base of the ocean’s food chain and creators of much of the oxygen in the atmosphere. On land and in the water, climate change affects all ecosystems.

So don’t be fooled by the smoke and mirrors from the denial noise machine. Distraction is all they have. But when you look behind the curtain, you see the reality of what’s happening to our planet. It’s warming up, it hasn’t stopped, and it’s changing everything.

TODAY IN SLATE

Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Republicans Like Scott Walker Are Building Campaigns Around Problems That Don’t Exist

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

The World

Iran and the U.S. Are Allies

They’re just not ready to admit it yet.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Politics
Sept. 16 2014 2:11 PM Spare the Rod What Charles Barkley gets wrong about corporal punishment and black culture.
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 2:35 PM Germany’s Nationwide Ban on Uber Lasted All of Two Weeks
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 1:27 PM The Veronica Mars Spinoff Is Just Amusing Enough to Keep Me Watching
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 1:48 PM Why We Need a Federal Robotics Commission
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 1:39 PM The Case of the Missing Cerebellum How did a Chinese woman live 24 years missing part of her brain?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.