Another exoplanet imaged?

The entire universe in blog form
Nov. 21 2008 9:03 AM

Another exoplanet imaged?

Another planet orbiting a sunlike star has been directly detected by imaging... maybe. Here's the image:

The possible planet orbiting Beta Pictoris is labeled. Click to embiggen. Image credit: ESO.

Phil Plait Phil Plait

Phil Plait writes Slate’s Bad Astronomy blog and is an astronomer, public speaker, science evangelizer, and author of Death From the Skies!  

Advertisement

In this infrared image (taken at 3.6 microns, about 5 times the wavelength the human eye can see), the planet is the labeled point of light. Image processing techniques have negated the light from the star, revealing the glowing tell-tale of the planet. But, like the previous planet seen circling Fomalhaut, this image needs a bit more explanation!

The star in question is β (beta) Pictoris, or just β Pic. It's about 64 light years away, and is far younger and a little bit hotter than the Sun. It has a disk of protoplanetary debris circling it, and from our angle we see it almost exactly edge-on, so the disk looks like a thick line bisecting the star. We've known about the disk since the 1980s.

But the disk is a little weird. There are actually two disks: the main one, and a much fainter, thinner one tilted a bit -- you can just make out the edges of it in the picture, to the left of the upper part of the main disk, and to the right of the main disk in the lower part. The main disk is also not symmetric; it stretches more on one side of the star than the other. There are also some features in it, what look like they are rings of material (but we see them edge-on too, so they are difficult to discern). All of this points to a disrupting influence on the disk, and that implies a big ol' planet in there somewhere.

The problem is finding it! The star is very bright (easily seen by the unaided eye in the southern hemisphere) and so any planet would be washed out. But astronomers using the Very Large (8 meter) Telescope have found something that is suspiciously like a planet. They very carefully subtracted the image of the star from itself (there are several techniques to do this) to reveal any faint blips that might remain, and voila! There it is.

It's a strong signal, so it's definitely real. But is it a planet? It might be a foreground or background object. The best way to know is to wait a year or two and take more images. If it is a planet, it will move across the sky along with the star. If it's a galaxy, it won't. Until we take more images, we won't know for sure.

However, note that it is aligned with the disk! That's a very strong (though circumstantial) piece of evidence that this truly is a planet. If I had to bet, I'd say it's the real thing. If it is, it's about 8 times the mass of Jupiter and about 8 times farther from the star than the Earth is from the Sun (somewhat less than the distance Saturn is from the Sun). The possible mass was determined using the brightness of the object; we know the star is about 12 million years old, and any planet that young will still be glowing from the heat of its formation -- in this case, at about 1200 Celsius. It's brightness and color depends on its mass, so the mass can be determined.

If this pans out, it will be the fourth planet directly imaged around a sun-like star. Incredible!

Remember, if it is a planet, it's not Earth-like at all. It's yet another super-Jupiter, and incredibly hot. But it's a planet.

Let me reiterate what I said in my last post on this topic. Trying to see faint objects near stars in astronomical images is phenomenally tough work. I spent weeks working on Hubble data to do this very thing, and it's mind-numbing, slow, meticulous, and difficult work. Subtracting a star's light from the image is really hard (one of the best pieces of software I ever wrote figured out the exact center of a star's image so another star's image could be used to subtract it, in fact) and if you're off by even a fraction of a pixel it won't work. This potential planet is deep in the bright part of β Pic's glow, yet they were able to see it clearly after processing, and that's an achievement all by itself.

I spent many months hoping to end up with a picture like this, and it is fantastically cool to see this dream finally come true -- especially with such a famous and well-studied target like β Pic. It's a great milestone, and my congratulations to astronomer Anne-Marie Lagrange and her team who were able to tease out this prize!

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

Jurisprudence

Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

My Father Was James Brown. I Watched Him Beat My Mother. Then I Married Someone Like Him.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 17 2014 12:02 PM Here It Is: The Flimsiest Campaign Attack Ad of 2014, Which Won’t Stop Running
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 17 2014 12:13 PM “For a While Liquidity Led to Stupidity”
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 17 2014 12:19 PM Early Cancer Hospitals Were Modeled on French Castles, Served Champagne
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Behold
Sept. 17 2014 11:06 AM Inside the Exclusive World of Members-Only Clubs
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 11:14 AM How Does That Geometry Problem Make You Feel? Computer tutors that can read students’ emotions.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 11:18 AM A Bridge Across the Sky
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.