Are Weblogs Changing Our Culture?

At Least Blogging Beats J-School
Inside the Internet.
Sept. 4 2002 7:56 PM

Are Weblogs Changing Our Culture?


Hey, Andy!

Does anyone ever call you Andy? I assume not.

Anyhow, if Drudge and Romenesko count as blogs, then of course blogs have already changed the media. (Yuck, "the media": I cringe at that phrase the way you do at "community.")

And as someone who, back in the day, co-conspired (with Graydon Carter and Jann Wenner) to invent your journalistic sub-genre, or sport, of nipping at the ankles of the New York Times (as the boss of Spy magazine's pseudonymous J.J. Hunsecker), I know that such nipping can indeed change the direction of that particular battleship by a quarter of a degree or so over time. (It can also, as one would expect and as you too insistently remind us, make important enemies.) What the relentless focus of bloggers like you and Kaus on the Times and other big media institutions must surely do is make writers (poor Paul Krugman!) and editors just a wee bit more careful about accuracy, fairness, and all the rest, since they know you overcaffeinated watchdogs are watching, just itching to click Send. And speaking of anti-Times obsessives, I think Ira Stoll's blog Smarter Times, now in suspended animation while he edits the New York Sun, may be proof that blogs are not scalable conceptually: As an informing principle for an entire daily newspaper, fear and loathing of the New York Times is not quite sufficient. (By the way, I'm not a subscriber to the Sun, but this morning they delivered four unsolicited, unaddressed copies to the front door of my house in Brooklyn. Desperation marketing?)

Are blogs ever going to drive a transformation of the press as significant as, say, cable TV news has? Nahhh. Providing a self-publishing outlet for professional journalists' rejected print pieces isn't exactly, as we used to say, not so far back in the day, a killer app. I agree that providing talented unknown writers a means of getting prose in front of readers and editors is a nice hypothetical blog virtue: As a father, I think I'd much rather subsidize a year of blogging by my daughters in 2010 than pay for a year at journalism graduate school. Yet, as you also say, even this is a marginal expansion of opportunity: As we've learned in every digital realm, the proliferation of groovy new tools to make and distribute media (music, movies, bloggers' pensées, whatever) does not expand the more or less fixed pool of genuine talent in the world.

However, as a souped-up column format nesting within larger media entities (a la Kaus, Alterman, and Conason), I think this is probably just the beginning, since those guys, like you, speak to one smallish audience about one smallish set of subjects. (By the way, why doesn't Michael Kinsley blog here under the Slate umbrella? I'd PayPal for that.) There are obviously passionate constituencies and suitable big-name blog voices for other subjects. Mightn't it make sense, for instance, for to turn Joel Stein into a blogger, or for to do it with Alessandra Stanley, or with Michael Musto? That is, it would make editorial sense—not financial sense, obviously, not today. But if more bloggers start being paid by rich institutions like Microsoft (Kaus) and GE (Alterman) to blog, then maybe we can start getting some real reportorial fiber into the very, very starchy blog diet. Which could betoken the beginning of a glorious Third Generation of journalistic blogs with impact and influence that would no longer be in question. Right?



Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Republicans Like Scott Walker Are Building Campaigns Around Problems That Don’t Exist

How Can We Investigate Potential Dangers of Fracking Without Being Alarmist?

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter


Hidden Messages in Corporate Logos

Subtle cues from FedEx, Amazon, and others.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

A No-Brainer Approach to Fighting Poverty: Better Birth Control

  News & Politics
The World
Sept. 16 2014 11:56 AM Iran and the U.S. Are Allies Against ISIS but Aren’t Ready to Admit It Yet
Sept. 16 2014 12:22 PM Poverty Rates Falls for First Time Since 2006, Remains Way Too High
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
Sept. 16 2014 12:05 PM Slim Pickings at the Network TV Bazaar Three talented actresses in three terrible shows.
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 12:01 PM More Than 3 Million Told the FCC What They Think About Net Neutrality. Why Hasn't Obama?
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 16 2014 7:30 AM A Galaxy of Tatooines
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.