Has Apple's new iPhone hit the limits of industrial design?

Innovation, the Internet, gadgets, and more.
April 19 2010 5:01 PM

That New iPhone Looks ... Just Like the Old iPhone

Has Apple reached the limits of industrial design?

New iPhone. Click image to expand.
New iPhone (left)

The next iPhone is going to look amazing. This is as close to a truism as you get in the tech industry—it's sort of like predicting that Warren Buffett will make smart investments, or that the next Judd Apatow movie will feature fart jokes. But now we know it for sure. On Monday morning, Gizmodo revealed that it had the new device in hand. (The site apparently purchased it from someone who found the supposed prototype in a Bay Area bar.) The gadget blog says it spent a week poking and prodding the phone and believes there's no doubt about the device's provenance. Yes, in the greatest breach of Apple's vaunted security that anyone can recall, the next iPhone has leaked. But that's what makes the big reveal such a letdown. Sure, the new phone looks good. But that's only because it looks pretty much the same as every other iPhone—not to mention just about every other phone on the market today.

If Gizmodo's phone is the real deal—and I believe it is—it proves what I've long suspected: The iPhone has reached the limits of industrial design. The first iPhone was a breakthrough because it replaced nearly every physical button with a touch-screen. It didn't conform to any standard notion of what a phone should look like—which, of course, is a hallmark of thrilling design. Since then, though, the iPhone's looks haven't thrilled. Apple has put out three models since 2007—the original, the 3G, and last year's 3GS—and each one has looked nearly identical to the last. The new one continues this trend.

Advertisement

In a way, this is a credit to the company's original vision—the first iPhone was so perfectly realized that changing it would ruin what makes it so great. The touch-screen is a fixed element of its design; for at least the next decade, you can expect the front of every new model to be dominated by a flat sheet of glass, the same as on every previous model. The iPhone's overall shape is also set in stone. Make the device any bigger, smaller, longer, or wider, and it wouldn't fit as well in your hand and your pocket. What's left to tinker with? Not very much. Apple can mess around with the phone's edges and its back, and it can alter the device's thickness or weight. These are exactly the kinds of small changes we see in Gizmodo's pictures.

The gadget blog describes the new iPhone as "drastically" different from today's model, but that only highlights our diminished expectations. From the front, the main difference is the phone's sides; today's iPhone has curved edges, while the one Gizmodo has is boxy. The new phone has a bigger battery than today's model, and it's got two cameras rather than one (a second front-facing camera lets you video-chat with your friends), all of which makes it 3 grams heavier than the 3GS. Apple has also redesigned the phone's back. The other side of today's iPhone is made of a curved slab of black plastic. The new one is flat and seems to be composed of a glasslike ceramic of a type that Apple once disclosed in a patent filing. The other changes are even tinier—there are two separate volume buttons instead of one, and the slot where the phone's SIM card sits has been moved from the top to the side. Overall, nothing about it is revolutionary. The new iPhone looks just like what you'd expect it to look like.

Indeed, it's telling how Apple disguised the phone to let it go out on the street—in a protective case that makes it look just like today's iPhone. I've seen a lot of chatter online about the new design: Some people think it's brilliant; others think it's ugly as sin. What I haven't seen is an understanding that most people will stick the phone inside a protective case, just as Apple did with this prototype phone. And when you put the old iPhone and the new iPhone in a plastic cover, they look nearly identical.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

The Democrats’ War at Home

How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?

Congress’ Public Shaming of the Secret Service Was Political Grandstanding at Its Best

Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke

A Plentiful, Renewable Resource That America Keeps Overlooking

Animal manure.

Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10

Politics

Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.

How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.

Building a Better Workplace

You Deserve a Pre-cation

The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.

The Ludicrous Claims Women Are Pitched at “Egg Freezing Parties”

Piper Kerman on Why She Dressed Like a Hitchcock Heroine for Her Prison Sentencing

  News & Politics
The World
Oct. 1 2014 11:48 AM Syria’s “Moderate” Rebels Are Realizing That U.S. Airstrikes Help Bashar al-Assad, Not Them
  Business
Buy a Small Business
Oct. 1 2014 11:43 AM “I Didn’t Want to Build the Next Twitter for Cats” Search funds are the quiet, dependable, risk-averse sibling to the startup. 
  Life
Outward
Oct. 1 2014 11:59 AM Ask a Homo: A Lesbian PDA FAQ
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 1 2014 10:54 AM “I Need a Pair of Pants That Won’t Bore Me to Death” Troy Patterson talks about looking sharp, flat-top fades, and being Slate’s Gentleman Scholar.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 1 2014 10:44 AM Everyone’s Favorite Bob’s Burgers Character Gets a Remix You Can Dance to
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 1 2014 11:48 AM Watch a Crowd Go Wild When Steve Jobs Moves a Laptop in This 1999 Demonstration of WiFi
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 1 2014 7:30 AM Say Hello to Our Quasi-Moon, 2014 OL339
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 28 2014 8:30 PM NFL Players Die Young. Or Maybe They Live Long Lives. Why it’s so hard to pin down the effects of football on players’ lives.