The Gist

Odds, Ends, and Senators

A mathematical computation about the midterms that’s, in the words of our expert, “sort of hideously irrelevant.”

The U.S. Capitol
Beware using applied math on the Senate midterms.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Listen to Episode 915 of Slate’s The Gist:

Subscribe in iTunes RSS feed ∙ DownloadPlay in another tab
Slate Plus members: Get your ad-free podcast feed.

On The Gist, Devin Nunes probably doesn’t know squat.

In the interview, Democrats hold most of the Senate seats up for grabs in this year’s midterms, which means they have a lot to lose. But importantly, mathematician Jordan Ellenberg says election predictions often fail to account for national mood. Ellenberg is the author of How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking.

In the Spiel, Mike defends his bougie laundry routine.

Join Slate Plus! Members get bonus segments, exclusive member-only podcasts, and more. Sign up for a free trial today at Slate.com/gistplus.

Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook.

Email: thegist@slate.com
Twitter: @slategist