A look into the 25th Amendment with Rep. Jamie Raskin.

The Reporting Behind the High Court’s Massive Errors

The Reporting Behind the High Court’s Massive Errors

Law and the Supreme Court justices who interpret it.
Oct. 28 2017 8:00 AM

The 25th Amendment, What’s That?

Rep. Jamie Raskin’s proposal to examine the president’s physical and mental aptitude.


To listen to this episode of Amicus, use the player below:

Dahlia Lithwick speaks with Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin about the remedy for Trump’s unfitness for office: the 25th Amendment. Later, she speaks with ProPublica’s Ryan Gabrielson about his recent reporting, which revealed that the high court tends to make staggering errors of fact in opinions.


Transcripts of Amicus are available to Slate Plus members several days after each episode posts. For a limited time, get 90 days of free access to Slate Plus in the new Slate iOS app. Download it today at Slate.com/app.

Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com.

Podcast production by Jordan Bell.

Dahlia Lithwick writes about the courts and the law for Slate and hosts the podcast Amicus.