The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and USA Todayall lead with BP shutting down the Prudhoe Bay oil field—the nation's largest—after the company discovered the pipelines were darn corroded. With Prudhoe supplying 2.6 percent of all U.S. oil needs, oil jumped 3 percent yesterday to nearly $77 per barrel, nine bucks away from inflation-adjusted record set in 1981. The Washington Post goes across-the-top with Prudhoe but in the traditional lead spot goes with Republican Congressman Bob Ney—aka "Representative No. 1" in the Jack Abramoff fun—announcing he's decided not to run for re-election. Ney was reportedly "reminded" by House Majority Leader John Boehner that, as the Post puts it, "with a son in college and a daughter nearing college age, he will need money," and it sure would be a pity if Ney ran then couldn't land a gig as a lobbyist.
BP said it isn't sure how long Prudhoe will be offline, but analysts guessed it will be a few months. The West Coast will be hit hardest since that's where most of the Prudhoe oil goes.
The other thing nobody knows: what the impact on gas prices will be. The administration has suggested it'll open up the strategic petroleum reserve to make up for the loss. That, combined with a bit of luck, could keep prices from kicking up too much. "This isn't a $4 deal because there is a way to replace the crude oil, and gasoline inventories are at a comfortable level out here," said one analyst. "There's a lot of flexibility."
The Post suggests BP was negligent and didn't take care of the pipelines. "They have known about these problems for a long time and promised for many years to fix them, and they haven't done so," said one local environmental lawyer. BP's pipeline had a major leak in March. Government-ordered inspections that followed—five months later—turned up the corrosion. According to the WP,the EPA is launching a criminal investigation.
The Wall Street Journal says the problem may ultimately be wider: Oil companies have tended to underinvest in infrastructure.
France and the U.S.'s proposed two-resolution solution to the crisis is now up for rejiggering after Arab countries lined up behind Lebanon and denounced the deal, namely that Israel gets to stick around until international forces come in.
France seemed open to renegotiating and the U.S. less so. As U.N. Ambassador John Bolton diplomatically put it, "It's not as though we drafted this resolution in a closet somewhere and suddenly sprang the text on any member government."
As the NYT emphasizes, the Lebanese government voted unanimously to send 15,000 Lebanese troops into the Hezbollah-controlled south. There are plenty of unknowns about the decision, but Haaretz flags what seems like the key: Hezbollah, as part of the government, endorsed the move. And oh, the troops won't be looking to disarm Hezbollah: One Lebanese minister said Hezbollah will be allowed to stick around the south "as a party that represents an entire segment of the population."
A front-page Post dispatch says Israel bombed the last bridge across the Litani River, meaning the once-resort town of Tyre is now isolated with no way out. "The city is completely cut off from the rest of the world," said a Red Cross spokesman, who added that Israel hasn't given the agency permission to use convoys in the south for the last three days.
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?
The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.
Happy Constitution Day!
Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.