Pope Benedict XVI had his first colloquy with the world media yesterday, report the WP and LAT. Both papers offer similar, unfavorable comparisons between Benedict's aloofness and papal predecessor John Paul II's effusiveness. Benedict, according to the LAT, "took no questions, waved to the crowd stiffly, almost mechanically, and departed after less than 20 minutes." John Paul, on the other hand, "waded into the sea of reporters and spent 40 minutes exchanging comments and quips with them" during his first press conference. The papers agree to call Benedict's performance abysmal, but there is one point of contention—was his throne "simple" (LAT) or "gilt" (WP)? The LAT and the NYT also front longer pieces exploring the roots of Benedict's conservatism in anticipation of today's papal investiture.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Self-Made Man
The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
The GOP Senate Candidate in Iowa Doesn’t Want Voters to Know Just How Conservative She Really Is
Does Your Child Have “Sluggish Cognitive Tempo”? Or Is That Just a Disorder Made Up to Scare You?
Naomi Klein Is Wrong
Multinational corporations are doing more than governments to halt climate change.
The Strange History of Wives Gazing at Their Husbands in Political Ads
Transparent is the fall’s only great new show.
Lena Dunham, the Book
More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.