The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times lead with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's unexpected proposal to amend his country's constitution to permit direct, multiparty presidential elections sometime this year. The free vote would be a first for Egypt, which Mubarak has governed unchallenged since 1981. The Washington Post reefers the democratic buzz out of Egypt but leads with allegations that Iran bought nuclear designs and materials from associates of infamous Pakistani nuclear black marketer A.Q. Khan nearly two decades ago. Investigators recently turned up evidence of the transaction, apparently the outgrowth of a "secret meeting" between Iranian officials and Khan deputies in 1987. One anonymous diplomat calls the findings "the strongest indication to date that Iran had a nuclear weapons program."
Analysts have pegged growing pressure from the Bush administration and the recent electoral examples of nearby Iraq and Palestine as the inspiration behind Mubarak's call for reform. (The LAT also notices that Cairo has been waiting for a $1 billion economic aid package from the U.S. which has been mysteriously held up.) But whether the democratic overture actually marks "a new political era" remains to be seen. Critics caution that Egypt's parliament, which must make the constitutional amendment, "has a long history of diluting reforms."
Some U.S. officials are hoping the new evidence of Iran's nuclear aspirations will convince Europe that it's time to take the Islamic Republic before the U.N. Security Council. That, however, seems like a long shot, since the latest intelligence is riddled with the usual caveats: While suspicious, the Post notes, "there is no evidence the materials were assembled in a manner consistent with bomb-building."
In a related story, the LAT offers an update on its excellent series of reports on the A.Q. Khan nuclear network. Weapons specialists reviewing nuclear warhead plans that Khan sold to Libya have been surprised by the documents' sophistication and level of detail. Khan's far-flung ring was shut down last year, but investigators are now beginning to worry that they didn't act soon enough.
Everybody notes that Palestinian militants Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for Friday's suicide bombing in Tel Aviv. Israel decried Syria for harboring the group and seemed careful to keep all blame away from new Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, who spoke out strongly against the attack. Israeli and Palestinian security forces have already arrested at least seven suspects.
The CIA is fretting about the possible prosecution of officers involved in the interrogation and detention of terror suspects, reports the NYT. So far, just one CIA contract employee has been slapped with criminal charges, but the agency's inspector general is said to be reviewing several other cases of alleged misconduct. Legal implications could be particularly tricky, too, since officers used as their guideline a 2002 legal opinion that has since been repudiated by the Justice Department.
In a similar spirit, the Post goes inside with a swansong for the glory days of the CIA. With John Negroponte gearing up to become national director of intelligence, the WP predicts that the special relationship between the Oval Office and Langley will wither. Additionally, the FBI and the Pentagon may take over some of the CIA's traditional duties. One wistful former agent calls the CIA "a wounded gazelle on the African plain."
The papers all give Page One space to the arrest of the BTK strangler in Wichita, Kansas. Police identified BTK—a self-chosen acronym for "bind, torture, and kill," his preferred method of murder—as Dennis Rader, a 59-year-old municipal employee. Authorities believe that he killed 10 people over the course of three decades.
The Post fronts a probing look at the "climate of fear" that has infiltrated the Russian judicial system under the presidency of Vladimir Putin. Judges who are seen as being too lenient face censure from a no-nonsense disciplinary body known as the Qualification Collegium. This, in turn, has created an emphasis on the quick and almost inevitable conviction of defendants that harkens back to the old Soviet system of jurisprudence.
One of the hot-button issues of the new Iraqi government will be deciding whether political parties can keep their militias, Edward Wong reports in the NYT. The Kurds, whose peshmerga militia totals 100,000 soldiers, are particularly adamant about maintaining their private army. The debate so far has been an awkward one for American authorities. On the one hand, they dislike the splintering of power and the potential for "warlordism." On the other, they need the Kurdish soldiers to help out with security.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Right Target
Why Obama’s airstrikes against ISIS may be more effective than people expect.
The One National Holiday Republicans Hope You Forget
It’s Legal for Obama to Bomb Syria Because He Says It Is
I Stand With Emma Watson on Women’s Rights
Even though I know I’m going to get flak for it.
Should You Recline Your Seat? Two Economists Weigh In.
It Is Very, Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice
Or, why it is very, very stupid to compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice.
In Defense of HR
Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.