The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Wall Street Journal worldwide news box, and Washington Postall lead with the latest report on abuses (in some cases "torture," said one of the report's authors) at Abu Ghraib. As expected, the report implicated about two dozen military intelligence soldiers as well as four contractors, despite the Pentagon's previous assertions that abuse was limited to a few guards. It also faulted top commanders for the now-familiar charge of "lack of oversight." USA Today, in an interesting choice, fronts the abuse report and instead leads with the revelation that police aren't sure what caused Tuesday's near-simultaneous crash of two Russian planes.  

Most of the papers pick up on the report's conclusion reiterating others' findings that the abuses may in part have happened because the interrogators in Iraq lacked guidelines. And so, taking their cues from the administration, they imported or tried to mimic the bare-knuckled interrogation techniques used on al-Qaida suspects in Afghanistan and elsewhere. The Army's former top intelligence officer in Iraq acknowledged this back in May during congressional hearings, but the initially papers flew past that.

The New Republic details how and why the interrogation policies, in the bland wording of one of the investigations, "migrated" from Afghanistan to Iraq.

Alone among the papers, the LAT fronts the report's broadside of the CIA for, among other things, hiding at least eight prisoners from the Red Cross. According to the Army report, one such "ghost detainee" was kept for four months in a 3-feet-by-6-feet cell that didn't have a "window, latrine or water tap, or bedding." The Post, which stuffs a similar take, emphasizes that the CIA hasn't announced any public inquiries while the LAT says Army investigators suggested the CIA stonewalled them, by declining to chat.

One more major report on the abuses is left, and it should be done next month. Like the majority of the others, it's limited in scope; it will look only at the Navy's treatment of detainees.

With the exception of USAT, everybody fronts Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah ali-Sistani's call for "all believers" to march on Najaf "to stop the bloodshed." Sistani himself, who just had heart surgery in Britain and made a surprise return to Iraq yesterday, is going to take part. But the details are sketchy as is Sistani's motivation. One Sistani aide said both Muqtada Sadr's forces and U.S. troops will be asked to leave town. Police in Najaf warned people to stay away from the city, and the LAT says police might try to close down the roads.

According to early morning reports, a mortar attack in the nearby town of Kufa has killed at least 25 people.

In Najaf, GIs are now within a few hundred yards of the Imam Ali shrine, and the NYT describes Sadr's men as on the "brink of disintegration." With Sadr himself MIA, Iraqi police in town arrested one of his top aides, an act the NYT says would have been "unthinkable" a few days ago.

The fighting is still rough. According the Post, "Several officers repeated an account of one Marine who entered a room, found a militiaman holding a rocket-propelled grenade launcher and killed him with a K-bar knife."

The NYT says there is "hardly a habitable building left standing" around the shrine.