The Kitchen Sink Cabinet

A summary of what's in the major U.S. newspapers.
June 7 2002 9:32 AM

The Kitchen Sink Cabinet

Everyone leads with President Bush's call for the creation of a Cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security to fight terrorism. The department would have around 169,000 employees and $37.4 billion in budgets from the numerous agencies it would absorb, including the Coast Guard, the Secret Service, and the INS. The administration and the papers call the proposal the biggest federal overhaul since the 1940s, when the War and Navy Departments were folded into the Defense Department and the CIA was created.

Advertisement

The papers also use a lot of front space discussing the coincidence of Bush's announcement with yesterday's televised hearings on 9/11 intelligence failures, tucking subheads about testimony by Minneapolis whistle-blower Coleen Rowley under banner headlines on the Bush speech.

As envisioned by the Bush administration, the new department would have four main subdivisions: "border, transportation and security; emergency preparedness and response; chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological countermeasures; and information analysis and computer protection" ( USA Today). The creation of the department would require congressional approval, which, according to the papers, it has: The Wall Street Journal says "the president's plan is seen by many lawmakers as an effort to catch up with their ideas." A Washington Post story headlined "A BID TO REGAIN THE INITIATIVE" notes that measures to create a Cabinet-level anti-terrorism department, spearheaded by Democratic lawmakers like Joseph Lieberman and Robert Byrd, have been gaining support on the Hill since Bush rejected the idea last fall.

All the papers discuss the obvious bureaucratic headaches that the restructuring will entail, but the USAT says it best with this understatement: "Combining everything from border patrols to smallpox preparedness under a mammoth $37 billion department could be a management challenge." 

Everyone mentions that two agencies won't be affected by the change: the FBI and the CIA. The New York Times notes that "raw reports"—like hints of the 9/11 attacks "will remain under the jurisdiction of the C.I.A., the F.B.I., the National Security Agency and other federal agencies." The WP echoes the administration's description of the department as "a customer" of the FBI and the CIA. 

Speculation abounds as to who will head the agency. "Bush advisors" tell USAT that current Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge is Bush's "first choice," but the president would try to recruit a "high-profile figure" (Rudy Giuliani is mentioned) if Ridge declines. The WSJ and NYT say it's unclear whether Ridge will be chosen.

The WP's "senior officials" think Bush will tap Ridge, but the paper says Bush's failure to name a secretary in his speech constitutes "a conspicuous omission." (Ridge's stock is apparently falling fast at the WP: In an earlier online edition of the story, sources were "virtually certain" that Ridge would get the nod.)

Most of the stories hint that the timing of Bush's announcement was intended to eclipse yesterday's public testimony by Coleen Rowley, where she repeated her criticisms of the FBI's bureaucracy. The WSJ has the best backup for this claim: "Earlier this week, a senior White House official said Mr. Ridge's plan wouldn't be ready for the president's review before next month." The NYT story about the hearings describes senators frustrated by the timing of Bush's announcement and details a "heated" exchange between Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., and FBI head Robert Mueller about Mueller's involvement in planning Bush's proposal.

The papers touch on the aftermath of Israel's assault on Arafat's Ramallah compound, mentioning Arafat's claims that the Israelis were trying to kill him, and an army spokesman's widely quoted response: "If there had been any intention of harming Arafat, it would not have been a problem."

The papers find some hope in the Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage's trip to Pakistan, where President Musharraf told him that Pakistan "won't be the one to initiate a war" with India. Armitage heads to Delhi today.

TODAY IN SLATE

History

Slate Plus Early Read: The Self-Made Man

The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.

Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada. Now, Journalists Can’t Even Say Her Name.

Mitt Romney May Be Weighing a 2016 Run. That Would Be a Big Mistake.

Amazing Photos From Hong Kong’s Umbrella Revolution

Transparent Is the Fall’s Only Great New Show

The XX Factor

Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada

Now, journalists can't even say her name.

Doublex

Lena Dunham, the Book

More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.

What a Juicy New Book About Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric Fails to Tell Us About the TV News Business

Does Your Child Have Sluggish Cognitive Tempo? Or Is That Just a Disorder Made Up to Scare You?

  News & Politics
History
Sept. 29 2014 11:45 PM The Self-Made Man The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 29 2014 7:01 PM We May Never Know If Larry Ellison Flew a Fighter Jet Under the Golden Gate Bridge
  Life
Dear Prudence
Sept. 30 2014 6:00 AM Drive-By Bounty Prudie advises a woman whose boyfriend demands she flash truckers on the highway.
  Double X
Doublex
Sept. 29 2014 11:43 PM Lena Dunham, the Book More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 29 2014 8:45 AM Slate Isn’t Too Liberal, but … What readers said about the magazine’s bias and balance.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 29 2014 9:06 PM Paul Thomas Anderson’s Inherent Vice Looks Like a Comic Masterpiece
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 29 2014 11:56 PM Innovation Starvation, the Next Generation Humankind has lots of great ideas for the future. We need people to carry them out.
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 29 2014 11:32 PM The Daydream Disorder Is sluggish cognitive tempo a disease or disease mongering?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 28 2014 8:30 PM NFL Players Die Young. Or Maybe They Live Long Lives. Why it’s so hard to pin down the effects of football on players’ lives.