Darrell Issa e-mail leaks: Why John F. Harris is massively overreacting.

Media criticism.
March 1 2011 12:32 PM

Politico's Editor Overreacts

John F. Harris, go soak your head.

John Harris. Click image to expand.
John F. Harris

I coughed up a lung laughing today as I read the Washington Post story about Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who is investigating his press spokesman for allegedly leaking hundreds of e-mails from dozens of reporters to New York Times reporter Mark Leibovich. (Leibovich is writing a book about Washington's political culture.)

[Update, 5:46 p.m., March 1: Issa has fired his press spokesman, Kurt Bardella.]

The organ expulsion came as I read the protestations of Politico Editor-in-Chief, John F. Harris, about the alleged leaks, which the Post quoted from a Politico story. Harris wrote:

The practice of sharing reporter e-mails with another journalist on a clandestine basis would be egregiously unprofessional under any circumstances. … As the editor-in-chief of Politico, my concern is heightened by information suggesting that Politico journalists may have had their reporting compromised by this activity.

In his interview with the Post, Harris expanded on this theme.

It's just intolerable if [information about] our reporting was shared with other journalists from other news organizations. … Our reporting is proprietary and our stories are competitive. Journalists have an expectation that their communication [with sources] is confidential.

Advertisement

Although I would be first to offer condolences to any reporter whose e-mails or inquiries to a press officer had been blithely shared with another reporter, I wouldn't spend more than five seconds on cheering him up. A certain variety of Washington reporter lives and dies by leaks from government officials, so I don't see why a government official leaking to a reporter about  a national security matter is kosher, but a government official leaking about what reporters are asking him about is "egregiously unprofessional," "compromising," or "intolerable," as Harris puts it.

As for Harris' expectation that communications from reporters will be "held confidential," well, I feel another lung coming up. Although I hope flacks will keep confidential my inquiries to them and their bosses, never in my journalistic career have I believed that a flack would keep his mouth zipped. Flacks and reporters are in the business of distributing information, not sequestering it. They move information like currency traders! They're blabbermouths! This is one reason why reporting on the press is so easy, why the freshest journalistic recruit can start reporting on the press with almost no experience: Reporters love to give up their secrets and the secrets of others. Why?  Because that's what they're trained to do! Flacks are almost as loose-mouthed.

Anybody composing e-mails these days should proceed on the assumption that what they write will be posted on the Web milliseconds after they send it. E-mail is not a secure form of communication. You might as well skywrite your questions to a press spokesman as put them in an e-mail. If Harris is so upset about his reporters' e-mails getting leaked to Leibovich, he should have them use the phone. It's not a leak-proof device, but it's harder to forward a phone conversation unless you're running a tape recorder.

Of course it is wrong for somebody to share correspondence without asking for permission first, but if that ethical constraint were universally observed, there would be no journalism. We'd all be rewriting GAO reports for a living.