Murdoch then recounted the criticism he's faced for evicting BBC News from his Asian satellite-TV company, Star. The BBC was paying $10 million a year for the slot, he told the assembly.
"The BBC has a lot more money than I; they can get their own transponder and their own satellite. And that was taken as me kowtowing to the Chinese government. And I've had that hung around my neck forever," he said.
Hold it right there, Rupe, and let me tighten that necktie with a retrospective of your comments about the BBC and Star.
After News Corp. purchased Star in 1993, it dumped the BBC because its news coverage displeased Chinese authorities, a point that was widely reported as fact. The company downplayed those stories for a few months until Murdoch told his biographer, William Shawcross, the truth. Chinese leaders "hate the BBC," Murdoch told Shawcross. Of his critics, Murdoch said, "They say it's a cowardly way, but we said in order to get in there and get accepted, we'll cut the BBC out."
This turnabout was reported in both the June 14, 1994, Wall Street Journal ("Rupert Murdoch ... has acknowledged months after the fact that he yanked British Broadcasting Corp. news from his satellite television service in northern Asia in hopes of soothing bad relations with China") and the June 14, 1994, Financial Times ("Mr. Rupert Murdoch … has finally admitted that he kicked BBC World Service Television off his Star TV system in Asia to please the Chinese government and help establish the satellite service there.")
(One of Murdoch's top guys tells a similar story in his recent book Rupert's Adventures in China: How Murdoch Lost a Fortune and Found a Wife.)
Then, 13 years later, Murdoch decided to recant his confession, insisting in the May 24, 2007, Financial Times that:
Star was losing $100m per year; we had to pay $10m per year to the BBC. I said "Let them pay it themselves," and they did. We also cancelled two other third-party channels—MTV and Prime Sports. At that stage we never ever had any request from anybody in China. Indeed, there was no discourse at all.
That he's a demonstrably poor teller of lies proves, once and for all, that Murdoch is not the Antichrist.
****** What I do call Murdoch every chance I get is a genocidal tyrant. But even a genocidal tyrant can have a good day. Like today! One of his newspapers, the Australian, ran a lengthy review of Rupert's Adventures in China, which the Australian Web magazine Crikey calls "earnest, broadly discursive, insightful and sometimes amusing." What makes this newsworthy, of course, is that the Murdoch-owned Far Eastern Economic Review spiked a review of the book last month in an act of what the author of Rupert's Adventures would describe as "anticipatory compliance." Send your Murdoch musings to firstname.lastname@example.org. (E-mail may be quoted by name in "The Fray,"Slate's readers' forum, in a future article, or elsewhere unless the writer stipulates otherwise. Permanent disclosure: Slate is owned by the Washington Post Co.)
TODAY IN SLATE
Meet the New Bosses
How the Republicans would run the Senate.
The Government Is Giving Millions of Dollars in Electric-Car Subsidies to the Wrong Drivers
Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.
Cheez-Its. Ritz. Triscuits.
Why all cracker names sound alike.
Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom
This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059
- Protesters Take to the Streets to Sound Alarm on Climate Change in New York, Across the World
- Knife-Carrying White House Jumper is Vet who Feared “Atmosphere Was Collapsing”
- North Korea: American Sentenced to Hard Labor Wanted to Become “Second Snowden”
- Almost One in Four Americans Support Idea of Splitting From the Union
Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?
A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.