The GOP says it's too humble to support comprehensive health reform.

How to fix health policy.
Feb. 25 2010 11:31 AM

Health Summit: The Humble-Off

The GOP's opening bid: We're too humble to support health reform.

Click here for a glossary of health reform jargon and slogans.

Click here for a guide to following the health care reform story online.

Click here and here for complete video of the seven-hour Blair House meeting, and here, here, here, and here for the complete transcript.

Sen. Lamar Alexander. Click image to expand.
Sen. Lamar Alexander

At today's Blair House confab, Sen. Lamar Alexander, R.-Tenn., was designated by the grumpier and less telegenic Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R.-Ky., to make the GOP's opening statement. In doing so, he laid down the Senate Republicans' strategy in opposing health care reform and not offering a comprehensive bill of its own. House Minority Leader John Boehner, R.-Ohio, introduced a comprehensive health reform bill (text, summary), but McConnell has not, and Alexander indicated he isn't about to now.

Advertisement

Why not? Not because health care doesn't need reforming but, rather, because comprehensive bills don't work. "We've come to the conclusion," Alexander said, "that we don't do 'comprehensive' well." That was the problem with cap and trade, Alexander said; it was the problem with immigration reform (taken up under President George W. Bush); and it's the problem with health care reform. None of these bills has cleared Congress. Such bills "fall of their own weight," Alexander explained. "Our country is too big, too complicated, too decentralized" for comprehensive legislation. Then (in a dig at Obama's former employment as a law professor), Alexander said, "That sort of thing works well in a classroom" but not in the real world. So while Republicans will support certain incremental reforms (malpractice reform, selling health insurance across state lines, expanding health savings accounts, and so on), they won't support comprehensive health reform of any kind. Not in the Senate, anyway.

This is a little hard to take from a political party that during the past decade cranked up its war against al-Qaida into a war against terrorism itself (under a president who came into office performing a similar Uriah Heep act). But Alexander was internally consistent, because he was willing to say that extending health care to more Americans wasn't a good idea. "As much as we want to expand access," he said, "we shouldn't expand a system that's this expensive." Give up on expanding access, and you can forget about the "three-legged stool" of health reform. No prohibition against insurers turning customers away based on pre-existing conditions; no individual mandate requiring everyone to purchase health insurance; and no subsidies to help lower-income people purchase health insurance. Republicans come off as more humble. They also come off as having little interest in helping the 45 million people who lack health insurance. Let 'em wait.

President Obama didn't respond (at least not initially; as I write we're only about one hour into the summit) to Alexander's criticism of comprehensive legislation. He said he doesn't want to talk about process; he wants to "talk about the substance." That doesn't necessarily mean Obama is ready to chuck a comprehensive approach. Probably it means that Obama doesn't want to lose a humility-off with Alexander, and that he wants to stick to a strategy of forcing Republicans to specify what they'll support and what they won't. So far, every time a Republican has said in this meeting that he wants this or that reform, Obama has said, in effect, "Great! Let's put it in the bill!" or (more often), "Dude! That's already in the bill." Roll all these GOP reforms into a bill and what have you got? A comprehensive bill.

Become a fan of Slate on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

AP Video: Health Care Summit

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

Politics

The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.