How the gun lobby groped its way into the health reform debate.

How to fix health policy.
Nov. 25 2009 6:42 PM

Gun Nuts Against Health Reform

How the gun lobby groped its way into the Obamacare debate.

Click here for a guide to following the health care reform story online.

Larry Pratt.
Larry Pratt 

Gun Owners of America is a lobby group dedicated to the proposition that the National Rifle Association is a bunch of accommodationist sissies. Since June it has been campaigning energetically against the health care reform bill ("TeddyCare"). What does health reform have to do with gun control? Absolutely nothing. But when you're a wingnut and right-wing rage is in the air, the sidelines can seem awfully lonesome.

GOA's primary animus appears to be against health reform's "individual mandate" requiring people who lack health insurance to acquire some. This offends GOA for approximately the same libertarian reasons that gun control does. A June 16 alert to members went on at great length about the requirement that Americans "buy as much health insurance as the government demands." You had to read halfway down to find the gun-control angle, which was laughably tenuous. Computerization of medical records, which is promoted in the bill, meant that the government would acquire all sorts of information relating to … gun ownership.



"Remember," asked GOA, "when your son was asked by his pediatrician about your gun collection?" Er, no. "That would be in the federal database." It continued:

Remember when your wife told her gynecologist that she had regularly smoked marijuana ten years ago—thereby potentially barring both her and you from ever owning a gun again? That would be in the database.

Or if a military veteran complains to his psychiatrist that he's had emotional stress since coming back to the States, that would be in the database.

Or remember when gramps was diagnosed with Alzheimer's, thereby making him a "mental defective" who would have to relinquish his life-long gun collection? That's in there too.

Keeping guns out of the hands of Alzheimer's patients and the mentally ill seems a pretty good idea to me, but as it happens, there is no national medical database, and the bill would not create one. Even if one existed, the Health and Human Services Department would not be allowed to share such information with law enforcement authorities without explicit permission from Congress. David Blumenthal, national coordinator for health information technology, told Southern California Public Radio: "We don't want to do it, and it's not authorized. We don't just do things without the Congress permitting us to do them."

Sensing, perhaps, that it needed a better argument, in October GOA opened a new front against health reform: If forced to purchase health insurance, "[y]ou will have less money for buying firearms and ammunition."

Even GOA's own legal counsel, though, must have grasped the absurdity of this argument; buying food leaves you less money for buying firearms and ammunition, too, but that hardly makes supermarkets violators of the Second Amendment. And so a third front was opened, this time against health reform's provisions encouraging insurers to charge higher premiums to those engaged in unhealthy behavior. In the House bill, for instance, the Health and Human Services Department would award "wellness grants" to small businesses that promote preventive care, in part through "prevention and support for employee populations at risk of poor health outcomes." The activities cited as creating such a risk are tobacco use, obesity, stress, lack of physical fitness, poor nutrition, drug use, and poor mental health. But, GOA insisted, "nothing within the bill would prohibit rabidly anti-gun HHS Secretary Sebelius from decreeing that 'no guns' is somehow healthier."


On Nov. 17, GOA Executive Director Larry Pratt  contacted every U.S. senator urging him or her to vote "no" on the motion to proceed with debate on health care reform. This time, GOA attracted scattered media attention, including a mention by Cokie Roberts on National Public Radio, and the White House decided to weigh in. (Click here for GOA's sputtering reply.)


Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case

The Jarring Experience of Watching White Americans Speak Frankly About Race

Here’s Just How Far a Southern Woman May Have to Drive to Get an Abortion

The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented

Marvel’s Civil War Is a Far-Right Paranoid Fantasy

It’s also a mess. Can the movies do better?


Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada

Space: The Next Generation

An All-Female Mission to Mars

As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.

Watching Netflix in Bed. Hanging Bananas. Is There Anything These Hooks Can’t Solve?

The 2014 Kansas City Royals Show the Value of Building a Mediocre Baseball Team

  News & Politics
The World
Oct. 20 2014 1:50 PM Why We Shouldn’t be Too Sure About the Supposed Deal to Return the Abducted Nigerian Schoolgirls
Oct. 20 2014 2:16 PM Even When They Go to College, The Poor Sometimes Stay Poor
Oct. 20 2014 2:19 PM A Procedural Rule Could Keep Gay Marriage From Ever Reaching SCOTUS Again
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 20 2014 1:10 PM Women Are Still Losing Jobs for Getting Pregnant
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 20 2014 7:15 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 9 A spoiler-filled discussion of "Flatline."
Brow Beat
Oct. 20 2014 1:26 PM This $248 Denim Jumpsuit Is the Latest Example of a Horrible Fashion Tradition
Future Tense
Oct. 20 2014 1:51 PM Will Amazon Lead Us to the Golden Age of Books? A Future Tense Event.
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Oct. 20 2014 11:46 AM Is Anybody Watching My Do-Gooding? The difference between being a hero and being an altruist.
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 10:23 AM Where I Was Wrong About the Royals I underestimated the value of building a team that’s just barely better than mediocre.