Jon Ossoff’s loss to Karen Handel in Georgia’s 6th District is a painful one for Democrats.

Democrats’ Positive Spin Doesn’t Make Their Loss in Georgia Less Painful

Democrats’ Positive Spin Doesn’t Make Their Loss in Georgia Less Painful

Who's winning, who's losing, and why.
June 21 2017 12:40 PM

More Liberal Tears

Democrats’ positive spin doesn’t make their loss in Georgia less painful.

96344965
Georgia’s 6th Congressional District Republican candidate Karen Handel gives a victory speech to supporters gathered at the Hyatt Regency on Tuesday in Atlanta.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

I’m not going to lie: I’m not surprised by Tuesday night’s result in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District election, but I am gutted by it. Republican Karen Handel, author of a book about Planned Parenthood titled Planned Bullyhood, ran a repulsive campaign. Advertisements by her allies tied Democrat Jon Ossoff to black bloc anarchists, Muslim terrorists, Kathy Griffin, and the shooter of Rep. Steve Scalise. As Dave Weigel wrote in the Washington Post, “The ad strategy, and the campaign visit from Republicans such as House Speaker Paul Ryan, have had almost nothing to say about what Republicans were working on in Washington. The message was that Republicans would feel terrible if they had to watch Democrats celebrate.” It worked; running on a platform of MOAR LIBERAL TEARS, Handel won with 51.9 percent of the vote. Kellyanne Conway tweeted “Laughing my #Ossoff.”

Some liberals are putting an optimistic spin on things: It’s a good sign for Dems, they argue, that Ossoff got as close as he did to victory in a district that hasn’t voted blue since Jimmy Carter was president. This isn’t wrong, but it doesn’t make the loss less painful. An Ossoff victory might have scared Republicans into siding with the majority of Americans who disapprove of the disgusting man occupying the White House. It might have spooked some of them out of passing a bill to gut health insurance for tens of millions of Americans. It would have made it clear that as nightmarish as the Trump presidency has been, as much as every day since Trump’s inauguration has been poisoned by his presence, help is on the way in the midterms.

Advertisement

Help may still be on the way. As Nate Silver reminds us, the improved Democratic margins in this year’s special elections are “consistent with the sorts of results Democrats would expect if they were on track to compete for the House next year.” But an emboldened Republican Party is going to do a lot of damage between now and then. One of the tireless women who campaigned for Ossoff was Carianne Muse, a working mother of three whose two youngest children were born with severe hearing loss. “Both kids have had surgeries that cost over $100,000 apiece that have been covered by insurance,” she told me. “When I changed jobs I didn’t have any pre-existing condition issues at all, [thanks to] Obamacare. But if I got fired tomorrow and we had a new law, I’d be terrified.”

I’m reading a lot of complaints about the Ossoff campaign this morning. Some people, including some of Ossoff’s own volunteers, say he should have hit Trump harder. Others say his loss proves that an anti-Trump message is not enough. Maybe another candidate or another strategy could have won, but I remain impressed by Ossoff, a 30-year-old first-time candidate who took everything the Republican Party could throw at him without losing his composure, and whose decent and hopeful campaign inspired thousands of volunteers to work their hearts out.

If there’s any reason for optimism, it’s those volunteers, who assured me again and again that, whatever happened on Election Day, they’re not going anywhere. A refrain I heard several times was, “We’re just practicing for the midterms.” If liberal funders were smart, they’d put money into some of the grass-roots groups that have sprung up in the 6th District to make sure they don’t wither in wake of Ossoff’s defeat. Earlier, I wrote about Jessica Zeigler, a working mother of three who started a program to train recent high school graduates to mobilize their social networks for voter outreach. Someone should be paying her to do this full-time in every congressional district in Georgia. Zeigler is devastated, but she texted me, “Friends are already organizing data-based feedback forms and strategy meetings. So we are resilient.” Let’s hope the country is, too.

One more thing

Since Donald Trump entered the White House, Slate has stepped up our politics coverage—bringing you news and opinion from writers like Jamelle Bouie and Dahlia Lithwick. We’re covering the administration’s immigration crackdown, the rollback of environmental protections, the efforts of the resistance, and more.

Our work is more urgent than ever and is reaching more readers—but online advertising revenues don’t fully cover our costs, and we don’t have print subscribers to help keep us afloat. So we need your help.

If you think Slate’s work matters, become a Slate Plus member. You’ll get exclusive members-only content and a suite of great benefits—and you’ll help secure Slate’s future.

Join Slate Plus