Scott Walker and the 2016 presidential election: The Wisconsin governor benefits from the state’s polarized politics.

Why Wisconsin’s Polarized Politics Makes Scott Walker a 2016 GOP Contender

Why Wisconsin’s Polarized Politics Makes Scott Walker a 2016 GOP Contender

Who's winning, who's losing, and why.
Feb. 12 2014 12:12 PM

The Rise of Scott Walker

Wisconsin may be the most polarized state in the Union. It’s also what might put its governor in the White House.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker at the U.S. Embassy April 15, 2013 in Beijing, China.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker at the U.S. Embassy on April 15, 2013, in Beijing.

Photo by Andy Wong/Getty Images

Valentine’s Day isn’t just a Hallmark holiday for people in Wisconsin. It’s also the anniversary of the first protests against Gov. Scott Walker after he proposed his anti-union legislation in 2011. Students and teaching assistants were on the front lines of the protests, walking out of class to march up State Street to the Capitol with bullhorns and leaving “valentines” outside Walker’s office asking him to change his mind. During that month, the crowd of protesters swelled to 30,000, then 100,000.

But three years later, the valentines are gone. The thousands of people who came for the protests and counterprotests are gone. The stands selling anti-Walker buttons and shirts emblazoned with the pro-union groups’ iconic blue fist are gone, too. The packs of people with bullhorns aren’t roaming downtown anymore. Now, only a handful of people gather in the Capitol rotunda every day at noon to sing protest songs. But guess who is still here?

This November, Walker will fight his third gubernatorial race in four years. And although he’s not as loathed as he was three years ago, Wisconsin is just as polarized. After all, this is a state whose two senators vote against each other more often than any two senators from the same state. This is a state where the first openly gay senator elected cannot get married. This is a state that petitioned for a historic recall (disclosure: I signed the petition), then overturned it. This is an electorate who voted for Walker in June, then voted for President Obama in November of the same year.


“This is a state that does not have uniformly predictable aggregate political views,” says Kenneth Mayer, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. “That’s an academic way of saying people don’t vote the same way, and it can be hard to predict.”

The state of Wisconsin is in a semi-permanent identity crisis, and that crisis has both helped Walker gain statewide prominence and made people want to kick him out of office. But the June 2012 recall election against Walker could severely backfire on the people who organized it. "For Walker, the recall is in some ways the gift that keeps on giving," says Charles Franklin, who runs the Marquette University Law School Poll. "The recall established him nationally in conservative circles, gave him much more visibility nationally than he would have had otherwise, and most importantly let him have a national fundraising base."

That national fundraising base has been a mixed blessing for Walker. A prank call that he credulously took from a radio host impersonating David Koch will haunt him for the rest of his career. The cost may have been worth it, though—the real David Koch donated $1 million to groups supporting Walker in 2012, and the Koch-funded group Americans for Prosperity shelled out $10 million on behalf of the governor. Other out-of-state millionaires like Sheldon Adelson and Foster Friess also got in the race. But it’s not just a handful of wealthy magnates financing his campaign—just take a look at this map of Walker contributions from 2012. Since Act 10—Walker’s controversial collective bargaining law aimed at labor unions—was introduced, only 38 percent of donations to Walker’s campaign have come from inside the state.

That isn’t to say Walker does not have support within Wisconsin—after all, he won the recall election by a wider margin than when he was first elected in 2010. Surprisingly, Walker’s job approval has fluctuated very little during the past two years, especially when compared to other divisive governors from the 2010 class like John Kasich of Ohio. “The consistency over a two-year period is striking for how harsh political attitudes toward Walker have been,” Franklin says.

But more than the lingering resentment over his collective bargaining law, Walker will have to grapple with slow job growth. In his 2010 campaign, Walker promised to create 250,000 jobs during his first term. With one year left, that number is less than halfway there. Wisconsin ranks 37th in job creation in that time, lagging behind other Midwestern states.

Social issues could also affect Walker’s fortunes. In June, Walker signed a mandatory ultrasound bill, which included a provision that would have shuttered the only Planned Parenthood abortion clinic outside of Milwaukee and Madison. That part of the law has been tied up in the courts.* He also turned down expanded Medicaid funds from Obamacare, leaving 83,000 people living below the poverty line to wait until spring for state coverage.