Four years ago during Ramadan, I was playing guitar in a train station in
I knew to always watch my back in
Well, not the fellow I met. We took a cab to his house, and I quickly realized something was amiss when he directed the driver to zip around in disorienting circles. My suspicion was, shall we say, confirmed when we arrived at his house and he locked me in a tiny dirt bathroom.
Eventually, Mohammed pulled me out, introduced me to his brother, and demanded that I sell his drugs in the United States for $10,000. He seemed confused when I told him that I couldn’t do that, and, in retaliation I think, he made me eat a fish head. He took the $60 in my wallet and futilely searched my backpack for more. Finding nothing much besides dirty clothes, he spent the rest of the night smoking pot and arguing in Arabic with his brother. When morning finally came, Mohammed stuffed a sheepskin rug into my pack, insisting that he wanted to square everything up for the $60. Then his brother drove me back to town.
My kidnapping bolsters Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s argument in favor of continuing to blast
He’s right. Recent Islamic history is crowded with Ramadan wars.
According to the many Islamic scholars I consulted, the Quran discourages violence during Ramadan but allows exceptions for self-defense and just causes. In Chapter 2, verse 217, Allah explains to Mohammed what he should tell people when they ask about Ramadan fighting: "Say: 'Fighting therein is a grave (offence); but graver is it in the sight of Allah to prevent access to the path of Allah, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members.' Tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter."
There’s clearly more than enough room there for a Muslim terrorist to justify violence against infidels. (In fact, Osama Bin Laden and his followers might consider Ramadan an especially good time for more terrorism. Ramadan traditionally magnifies all good deeds in Islam. According to the ahadith—traditions of the prophet recorded by early followers—"whoever discharges an obligatory deed in [Ramadan] shall receive the reward of performing 70 obligations at any other time." If a terrorist is crazy enough to consider mass murder of Americans a good deed, well, mass murder during Ramadan may be 70 times better.)
Theologically speaking, though, the Quran may justify American warfare, too. Its basic message is that righteous warfare is never prohibited. Even if the text is read more literally as justifying only warfare against those who "prevent access to the path of Allah," Rumsfeld could respond that
But even if Rumsfeld is correct that there’s no strict theological prohibition against Ramadan bombing, that doesn’t mean the country should fight during the holy month. Politically speaking, Ramadan is a uniquely inopportune time for this country to pummel Afghanistan—particularly given the rising instability in moderate Muslim countries that the United States desperately needs to remain stable, such as Indonesia and nuclear-armed Pakistan.