Mapping Super PAC “Hate-Spending” by State and Contributions

A partnership of Slate and the New America Foundation.
March 9 2012 6:30 AM

Super PAC Hate-Spending

A majority of spending goes toward opposition. Here’s a state-by-state breakdown.

140992733
Restore Our Future, which backs Mitt Romney, has spent millions on negative ads against Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images.

Unchecked Supper PAC fundraising and spending has resulted in an increasingly divisive political climate, with 54 percent of all money spent on opposition, mostly in the form of attack ads. The map below shows where Super PACs have fueled the most "hate" by state; hovering over markers reveals the percent spent on opposition out of total Super PAC spending. Tables on the right show a breakdown of spending in each state by candidate: The Restore Our Future PAC, which backs Mitt Romney, has spent 97 percent of its $31 million against Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. Explore the map to see who else is fueling this unprecedented political climate of hate.

About the Data
Data was collected from the Sunlight Foundation, which cleans up all independent expenditures reported by the Federal Election Committee. This data was sorted to filter out money spent on opposition, and grouped by Super PAC, candidate opposed, and state of expenditure. All maps made in open source design software Tilemill.

Background
On Jan. 21, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. FEC that corporations and unions could make unlimited independent election contributions so long as they complied with FEC disclosure regulations by registering as a political action committee. Two months later in March 2010, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appals ruled in Speechnow.org s. FEC that limits on contributions to PACs outlined in Federal Election Campaign Act violated the First Amendment. This created a provision for unlimited independent spending to advocate for the election or defeat of a federal candidate and has fundamentally shifted who holds the power and influence in the 2012 presidential election.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Altered State

The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender

What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?

Surprise! The Women Hired to Fix the NFL Think the NFL Is Just Great.

You Shouldn’t Spank Anyone but Your Consensual Sex Partner

Moneybox
Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM The Most Awkward Scenario in Which a Man Can Hold a Door for a Woman
  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 18 2014 8:58 AM Does this Colorado Poll Show Latino Voters Bailing on the 2014 Election?
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
  Life
Food
Sept. 18 2014 9:34 AM How to Order Chinese Food First, stop thinking of it as “Chinese food.”
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Television
Sept. 18 2014 8:53 AM The Other Huxtable Effect Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 9:00 PM Amazon Is Now a Gadget Company
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 18 2014 7:30 AM Red and Green Ghosts Haunt the Stormy Night
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 17 2014 3:51 PM NFL Jerk Watch: Roger Goodell How much should you loathe the pro football commissioner?