Big Mac, Attacked
With stirring prose, a leader in Britain's Independent stood up for an embattled establishment Saturday:
It is time to throw up the barricades to defend one of the great institutions of the modern world from the forces of reactionary rural hypocrisy. If liberalism is measured by the unpopularity of the cause, this is the standard to which true liberals should rally: the red flag with the two yellow arches stitched on it. We come to praise McDonald's.
The reason for the rhetoric was the trial in Millau, France, of José Bové, the "Robin Hood of Roquefort," accused with nine others of destroying a half-built McDonald's last August. The attack took place after the United States imposed 100 percent tariffs on some European specialty products—including Roquefort cheese—in retaliation for Europe's ban on hormone-treated U.S. beef. Bové, whose sheep provide milk for Roquefort, has become a poster child of the war on globalization, and Millau has been transformed into "Seattle-on-Tarn." According to the International Herald Tribune, he embodies a "worldwide struggle … of farm versus city, authentic food versus junk food, local versus global, European versus American."
In its defense of America's most famous culinary export, the Independent took a populist tack:
Global capitalism brings benefits to everyone. For the few, it supplies Rocquefort. For the many … it supplies the Big Mac. … The French pretend not to like McDonald's because they are snobbish about food. The British pretend not to like it because they are snobbish about sharing their restaurants with the mass of their fellow citizens. Both nations should throw off their snobbery and learn, if not to love, at least to accept and welcome the Golden Arches.
Even in the French press, it was hard to find whole-hearted support for Bové's position. The liberal French paper Libération detected a worrisome nationalism in his rhetoric. Its editorial concluded:
It is extremely important not to allow the "sovereignist" right to exploit identity politics to legitimize xenophobia, intolerance, and national autism.
Also opposing Bové, the Financial Times pointed out some inherent contradictions:
His movement runs on the internet and the cellphone yet vilifies the science and the multinationals that created them. It seeks alliances with groups whose members are largely the beneficiaries—as citizens of the rich, powerful and globally competitive French economy—of globalization.
In Australia, the Sydney Morning Herald denounced the "21st century Robespierre" as a hypocrite:
