Bob Filner Is the Victim of a Bloody Lynch-mob Coup

How you look at things.
Aug. 26 2013 8:56 AM

The Crucifixion of Bob Filner

He’s not a serial sexual harasser. He’s the victim of a bloody lynch-mob coup.

174490094
Mayor Bob Filner of San Diego at a press conference regarding his sexual harassent accusations, July 26, 2013.

Bill Wechter/Getty Images

Have you heard the news? On Friday, there was a coup, a lynching, and a bloody shooting. And all of these atrocities were perpetrated against one man: Bob Filner, the outgoing mayor of San Diego.

William Saletan William Saletan

Will Saletan writes about politics, science, technology, and other stuff for Slate. He’s the author of Bearing Right.

If you’ve been following this week’s commemorations of the 1963 March on Washington, you might have heard about lynchings. Eight years before the march—the anniversary is this Wednesday—a 14-year-old black boy named Emmett Till was kidnapped, pistol-whipped, and murdered, supposedly for making a pass at a white woman. Four days after the march, one of its organizers, civil rights leader James Farmer, narrowly escaped a lynch mob that was “kicking open doors in the black community,” “beating up any blacks seen in the streets,” and shouting, “When we catch that goddamned nigger Farmer, we gonna kill him.”

Naturally, being accused by all these women has made Filner feel a certain kinship with Till and Farmer. On Friday, Filner told the San Diego City Council:

“I started my political career facing lynch mobs. And I think we have just faced one here in San Diego. In a lynch mob mentality, rumors become allegations, allegations become facts, facts become evidence of sexual harassment, which have led to demands for my resignation and recall. Not one allegation, members of the council, has ever been independently verified or proven in court. I have never sexually harassed anyone. But the hysteria that has been created, and many of you helped to feed, is the hysteria of a lynch mob.”

According to Filner, this mob has pursued him with lethal violence. If you’ve noticed the civil war in Syria, you might be familiar with lethal violence. More than 100,000 people have died in that conflict, including thousands of children gassed, bombed, stabbed, or shot. Naturally, Filner identifies with these victims. In Friday’s remarks, he noted that he, too, has been violently targeted:

“There are well-organized interests who have run this city for 50 years who pointed the gun. And the media and their political agents pulled the trigger. … People opposed me from the beginning. They found the weapons they needed in my own failures as a human being. But they found those weapons. And they used them. In a bloody and vicious way. … [T]he fight for control of this city has become, as I said, vicious and bloody.”

How exactly did this bloody assault unfold? The San Diego Union-Tribune has the whole grisly story. First, a longtime Filner supporter and former aide, having received “credible evidence” of sexual harassment, sent him a private letter asking him to resign. That didn’t work, so she and two other longtime supporters held a press conference urging the mayor to quit. Then Filner’s fiancée, having noticed other sexual misbehavior, ditched him and called for his resignation. Then Filner’s former communications director sued him for harassment.

Advertisement

The assault culminated in a coup. If you’ve been watching events in Egypt, you might be familiar with how a coup works. Last month, the Egyptian army suspended the constitution, surrounded the president’s palace, took him into custody, cut him off from outside communications, and arrested the leaders of his party. This month, Egyptian security forces raided sit-ins and killed hundreds of protesters along with dozens of people in custody. Still, the country’s cowardly military rulers refuse to call their seizure of power a coup.

If only they had Filner’s courage. Like the president of Egypt, Filner has been prematurely forced from office. And he’s not afraid to call his ouster what it is. “Those of you in the media and in politics who fed this hysteria,” he told his critics, “You have unleashed a monster. … [T]he hysteria ended up playing into the hands of those who wanted a political coup. The removal of a democratically elected mayor purely by rumor and innuendo.”

In Filner’s case, the coup was devilishly subtle. First his top staffers began to quit. Then the publisher of a local gay weekly launched a campaign to recall the liberal mayor from office, collecting more than 20,000 signatures. Right-wing politicians such as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Dianne Feinstein publicly called on Filner to resign. The final blow came from the city council, which, in exchange for the mayor’s resignation, agreed to provide him with legal defense against harassment lawsuits and pay for any settlements with his accusers.

Technically, of course, what happened to Filner wasn’t a coup or a lynching. Nobody pointed a gun at him or pulled a trigger. He’s just another ordinary guy who had to give up his political career after being falsely accused of sexual misconduct by 18 women. But why get all picky and literal? Why fuss when people who live in wealth, privilege, and modern comfort call feminists Nazis, equate taxation with slavery, describe their confirmation hearings as “high-tech lynchings,” or claim to have been “crucified” for their anti-gay views?

Because the insult is bigger than its target. When you call feminist Nazis, you cheapen the Holocaust. When you equate taxation with slavery, you belittle the suffering of slaves. When you describe your bad PR week as a crucifixion, you mock the people who died on the cross.

If you ever get around to apologizing to all those women, Mr. Filner, start thinking about the victims of racial and political violence you insulted on your way out. They actually suffered. All you did was sin.

William Saletan's latest short takes on the news, via Twitter: