AMMAN, Jordan—Lally Weymouth met with Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh last week in Amman, where he spoke with optimism about a possible breakthrough in Syria and the impact of the conflict in the neighboring country. Excerpts:
Lally Weymouth: How do you see the situation in Syria?
Nasser Judeh: We had the meeting of what we call the London Eleven—an offshoot of the Friends of Syria. It was a good meeting. We have had a series of such meetings—this one was in Amman in May. In between meetings, there was this major development—the Russian and American understanding that we are now going to [have] an international conference, the purpose of which is to implement Geneva I.
L.W.: How would you define Geneva I?
N.J.: Geneva I boils down to one basic sentence, which is: the creation of a transitional governing body [in Syria] that will take over executive power. The disagreement around Geneva I was [whether the transitional government would be created] in cooperation with the regime or after the regime departs. Now I think everybody has gone back to the idea of the regime being part of the negotiations.
L.W.: So the regime will be part of setting up the transition?
N.J.: They will have a negotiating team, the opposition forces will have a negotiating team, and the purpose of this negotiating process is to create this transitional governing body.
L.W.: After that, there is no future for the regime?
N.J.: That's the general understanding.
L.W.: It seems that ever since U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov that the Iranians and Hezbollah have actually stepped up the fight inside Syria.
N.J.: That's why you saw in the communiqué of the Amman meeting the reference to foreign or non-Syrian fighters on Syrian soil, which we believe is very dangerous.
L.W.: Isn't it true they have actually escalated the fighting in the past few weeks?
N.J.: This is a very dangerous development. If anything, it brings home, in a more urgent way than ever, the need to have a political solution to end this violence before we have this kind of foreign presence on Syrian soil.
L.W.: Are you talking about Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia?
N.J.: We referred specifically to fighters from Hezbollah and fighters from Iran.
L.W.: What about Russia?
N.J.: [Russia] doesn't have fighters on the ground, but they certainly are not hiding the fact that they are sending weapons to the Syrian regime as per contracts in the past.
L.W.: The Kerry meeting doesn't seem to have produced anything.
N.J.: On the contrary, we look at the Kerry-Lavrov-Putin discussions as a serious turning point because in the past there was major disagreement with the Russians over their interpretation of Geneva I and now the idea is to have an international conference that implements Geneva I.
L.W.: Are the Russians concerned with where [Syrian] President [Bashar al-] Assad would go if his government were to fall?
N.J.: In all of our discussions with the Russians—and we have open links with the Russians because they are key—we have never heard from any Russian official a statement to the effect that they are in this because of the regime or any personalities in the regime. They always make it a point to say that they are concerned for the security, stability, and unity of Syria.
L.W.: So the Russians are not concerned for Assad himself?
N.J.: We have never heard anything from them that indicates that they are in this because of personalities in the regime. I think they are concerned with the overall situation in Syria.
L.W.: Do you mean, for instance, they are concerned about their port [at Tartus]?
N.J.: More than that. Their concern is for Syria to have no extremist organizations set up shop in the future. So what we hear from the Russians continuously—not just privately but publicly—is that this is not about this regime or that regime. It's about the overall picture.
L.W.: Jordan has a huge problem with Syrian refugees pouring in here, don't you?
N.J.: That's right. So far we have about 540,000 refugees on Jordanian soil. But the daily average, as of six or seven months ago, is 2,000 a day. It's gotten to 540,000—140,000 of whom are in refugee camps, and the rest are in Jordanian towns and villages.
L.W.: And Jordan is opening another camp?
N.J.: We opened a second camp, and a third camp is being worked on. The largest is Zaatari Camp, which has 140,000 people. So you're talking about almost 400,000 people in Jordanian towns and villages. That's 10 percent of our population.
The Lebanese also have a lot of refugees. The difference is that our economy has its challenges. And there are four or five key sectors of our economy that are affected: water, energy, education, health, and, most importantly, job opportunities. The 400,000 Syrians who are in Jordanian towns and villages are occupying jobs that Jordanians would naturally take. Jordan has always hosted refugees, but we are literally unable to cope anymore.
L.W.: I understand that Jordan is being much more active now in helping the Syrian opposition. Is that true?
N.J.: We are all helping the opposition. We had this conference in Amman to help the opposition unite and expand so that they can represent their case properly at this international conference and deal with the regime counterparts in a way that produces effective results.
L.W.: Aren't a lot of Saudi arms going into Syria via Jordan?
N.J.: I'm not going to address that.
TODAY IN SLATE
I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.
Republicans Like Scott Walker Are Building Campaigns Around Problems That Don’t Exist
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter
The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge
Iran and the U.S. Are Allies
They’re just not ready to admit it yet.
Giving Up on Goodell
How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.