Should You Put Your Money in an Offshore Tax Haven?

Answers to your questions about the news.
Feb. 15 2013 1:17 PM

Tax Holiday

Should you stash your money in the Cayman Islands?

Jack Lew testifying before the Senate Finance Committee.
Jack Lew testifies before the Senate Finance Committee

Photo by Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

Jack Lew, President Obama’s nominee for treasury secretary, faced questions about his investment in a Cayman Islands-based hedge fund during his confirmation hearings Wednesday. President Obama railed against offshore tax havens in both of his presidential campaigns. But if offshoring is generally legal—and seemingly lucrative—should you try it?

Probably not. You can avoid only specific kinds of taxes using an offshore tax haven, and, for the most part, those taxes are significant only to large groups or very wealthy individuals. Consider, for example, the unrelated-business-income tax. Income from investments inside retirement accounts is generally untaxed until the owner withdraws the profits later in life. However, for complicated historical-legal reasons, if you use retirement funds to borrow money, and then invest that borrowed money in a partnership, you must pay a 35 percent tax on the profits. Hedge funds and pensions circumvent this tax by routing borrowed money through a corporation in an offshore tax haven, which is not the sort of business investment that triggers the 35 percent tax. The trick is known as “round-tripping,” because the money passes through a foreign country on a round trip from the United States. (You may be involved in round-tripping through your own pension fund without knowing it.) It costs money to set up a foreign corporation, though, so this strategy only makes sense for individuals who have vast wealth. If you have enough money in your IRA to consider buying a controlling stake in a business, you probably shouldn’t rely on the Explainer for tax advice.

There are a couple of other scenarios in which you might want to use an offshore tax haven, like if you’re starting a dot-com with friends from other countries. But, for the most part, there are no lawful benefits to opening a savings or investment account in a low-tax or no-tax foreign country. U.S. citizens are required to pay tax to the federal government on foreign investment income, even if the interest, dividends, and appreciation never come home to the United States. Failing to report such income constitutes tax fraud and carries the potential for a 75 percent penalty and a prison sentence. In fact, the federal government requires you to disclose all foreign holdings if they total more than $10,000, even if you have no interest to report on that money. Failure to notify the government of those accounts, using the colorfully named “FBAR” form, carries a penalty of 50 percent of the account value or $100,000, whichever is greater. (The IRS periodically announces amnesties for people willing to come clean about their offshore accounts.) Countries that have served as tax havens, like Switzerland, Panama, and Lichtenstein, are increasingly signing agreements to disclose the existence of these accounts to foreign governments, making it difficult to avoid detection.


If you’re really serious about tax avoidance, you can’t stop at offshoring your savings—you’ll have to offshore yourself. Last year, the federal government predicted that thousands of people would renounce their citizenship by the end of 2012, many of them to avoid paying U.S. tax. There’s still a financial hit, though. When you give up your citizenship, you have to pay a one-time 15 percent tax on all assets. It could still make financial sense: The effective tax rate for U.S. expatriates in some Caribbean islands is under 5 percent. In giving up your passport, you’d be following Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin—who relinquished U.S. citizenship before the company’s IPO—and actor Jet Li. Gerard Depardieu became a Russian citizen this year to avoid French taxes.

Got a question about today’s news? Ask the Explainer

Explainer thanks Samuel Brunson of Loyola University of Chicago, James Hines of the University of Michigan Law School, and Daniel Shaviro of the NYU School of Law.

Brian Palmer is Slate's chief explainer. He also writes How and Why and Ecologic for the Washington Post. Email him at Follow him on Twitter.



Blacks Don’t Have a Corporal Punishment Problem

Americans do. But when blacks exhibit the same behaviors as others, it becomes part of a greater black pathology. 

I Bought the Huge iPhone. I’m Already Thinking of Returning It.

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

Lifetime Didn’t Think the Steubenville Rape Case Was Dramatic Enough

So they added a little self-immolation.

Two Damn Good, Very Different Movies About Soldiers Returning From War

Medical Examiner

The Most Terrifying Thing About Ebola 

The disease threatens humanity by preying on humanity.

Students Aren’t Going to College Football Games as Much Anymore, and Schools Are Getting Worried

The Good Wife Is Cynical, Thrilling, and Grown-Up. It’s Also TV’s Best Drama.

  News & Politics
Sept. 19 2014 9:15 PM Chris Christie, Better Than Ever
Sept. 19 2014 6:35 PM Pabst Blue Ribbon is Being Sold to the Russians, Was So Over Anyway
Inside Higher Ed
Sept. 19 2014 1:34 PM Empty Seats, Fewer Donors? College football isn’t attracting the audience it used to.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 19 2014 12:00 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? The Slatest editor tells us to read well-informed skepticism, media criticism, and more.
Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 4:48 PM You Should Be Listening to Sbtrkt
Future Tense
Sept. 19 2014 6:31 PM The One Big Problem With the Enormous New iPhone
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 19 2014 5:09 PM Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?   A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.