What Are the Odds Bruce Springsteen’s Obama Song Will Climb the Charts?

Answers to your questions about the news.
Oct. 19 2012 4:09 PM

Has a Presidential Campaign Song Ever Been a Hit?

Assessing the chances for Bruce Springsteen’s new Obama ditty.

Bruce Springstreen and Barack Obama
In this 2008 file photo Bruce Springstreen and Barack Obama appear together at a campaign rally.

Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images.

Bruce Springsteen debuted a song called “Forward and Away We Go” for President Obama’s re-election campaign on Thursday. Although catchy in patches, the song is unlikely to climb the charts, because Springsteen ran out of words that rhyme with “Obama.” Has a presidential campaign song ever been a legitimate hit?

Not recently. Popularity rankings don’t exist for most of the golden age of campaign jingles, but a few songs stand out as probable smash hits. Robert Paine wrote “Jefferson and Liberty” for the Virginian’s 1800 victory over John Adams. (Paine had written the Adams theme song “Adams and Liberty” for the previous election, proving he could switch allegiances if not song titles.) “Jefferson and Liberty” caught on immediately and remained the party’s unofficial anthem even after Jefferson left office. American fiddlers still play the tune today. (When stripped of the lyrics, it’s more accurate to refer to the song as “The Gobby-O,” which is the English tune on which “Jefferson and Liberty” was based, but few Americans do so.) Another political classic was the 1884 anti-Grover Cleveland song “Ma Ma, Where’s My Pa?” During Cleveland’s bachelor days in Buffalo, N.Y., hiss lover delivered an illegitimate child. Although she had been sleeping with several different men, Cleveland agreed to pay child support, and it later became a political scandal. The song imagines a child, suffering from a bee sting, plaintively inquiring into his father’s whereabouts. His mother responds, “Up in the White House, darling.”

We live in comparatively lean times for political songwriters. Presidential campaign strategists now largely eschew original anthem-writing in favor of existing popular music. Bill Clinton favored Fleetwood Mac’s “Don’t Stop.” John McCain went for ABBA’s “Take a Chance on Me.” During the 2000 campaign, George W. Bush cycled through Tom Petty’s “I Won’t Back Down,” John Mellencamp’s “R.O.C.K. in the U.S.A.,” and “Brand New Day” by Sting, as each musician demanded that the candidate stop using his song. Campaign songs are now so unimportant that Hilary Clinton’s advisors let her supporters choose one. (They went with “You and I,” by Celine Dion.)

Obama has inspired at least two songs—the new Springsteen number and will.i.am’s semi-original 2008 song “Yes We Can,” which achieved viral video popularity if not commercial success—making him something of a throwback in this regard. Before the rise of mass media, every campaign had at least one jingle that supporters could play and sing. Andrew Jackson, the ur-populist of American presidential campaigns, used “The Hunters of Kentucky,” a song that celebrated Old Hickory’s military victories. Supporters of John C. Fremont distributed a flyer full of songs in 1856, including one whose lyrics formed an acrostic of the candidate’s name. There were more than 50 songs praising Abraham Lincoln during the 1860 campaign, such as “Lincoln and Liberty.” (Nineteenth-century political lyricists just couldn’t resist that title construction.) William Howard Taft’s campaign invited voters to “Get on the Raft with Taft,” a peculiar choice given the 27th president’s heft. Franklin Roosevelt also offered a nautical theme during the 1932 campaign with “Row, Row, Row with Roosevelt.” (The chorus was intended to teach Americans how to pronounce the first syllable of FDR’s last name.) The last truly notable original presidential campaign song came in 1952, when Irving Berlin penned “I Like Ike” for Dwight Eisenhower, although jingles limped along for a few more election cycles.

Got a question about today’s news? Ask the Explainer.

Brian Palmer is Slate's chief explainer. He also writes How and Why and Ecologic for the Washington Post. Email him at explainerbrian@gmail.com. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.

Jurisprudence

Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 2:35 PM Germany’s Nationwide Ban on Uber Lasted All of Two Weeks
  Life
The Vault
Sept. 16 2014 12:15 PM “Human Life Is Frightfully Cheap”: A 1900 Petition to Make Lynching a Federal Offense
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 1:39 PM The Case of the Missing Cerebellum How did a Chinese woman live 24 years missing part of her brain?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 8:41 PM You’re Cut, Adrian Peterson Why fantasy football owners should release the Minnesota Vikings star.