According to a Gallup poll from early June, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, is the preferred candidate of 1 percent of GOP voters. Paul's supporters, though, insist that the libertarian congressman's poor numbers are a result of pollsters undercounting voters who use cell phones rather than land lines. Are cell-phone users really screwing up the polls?
Probably not. Those in the cell-phone-only crowd tend to be younger, poorer, more liberal, and more likely to be an immigrant or minority. But there aren't enough of them today—about 13 percent of U.S. households—and they aren't different enough from other young voters to make more than a one- or two-point difference in overall poll numbers. In most polls, a one- or two-point difference falls within the margin of error.
The Pew Research Center tried to get to the bottom of this issue recently, conducting four surveys to compare cell-only and land-line respondents on 46 questions. On average, the answers of cell users and land-liners differed by 8 percentage points per question. The biggest difference between the groups: A paltry 49 percent of the cell-only cohort said they're registered to vote, while 78 percent of land-line users claimed to be registered. Thus, mobile voters might be underrepresented in surveys, but they also don't turn out on Election Day. Groups like MoveOn.org courted this set in 2004 but still found a smaller turnout than expected among young voters.
Cell-only supporters could give a boost to a candidate like Paul, who's at the bottom of the polls. An additional two points in the polls, though, wouldn't be nearly enough to move him to the next tier of candidates. Hypothetically, Barack Obama—who appeals to many college students and African-Americans—and Bill Richardson—who has lots of Hispanic supporters—might also find a few hidden points. But overall, top presidential contenders already draw such wide support across age, income, and ethnicity brackets that cell-only voters would have minor effects on their polling numbers. Then again, an extra 2 percent could mean victory in a tight election. Late-afternoon exit polls on Election Day in 2004 put John Kerry three points ahead of George W. Bush—just enough to give the wrong impression.
Pollsters usually can't reach the land-lineless today; they'd have to pay interviewees for lost cell-phone minutes, plus figure out how to get people to pick up when they're not driving or otherwise occupied. So, the polls try to compensate by giving more weight to answers from similar voters. That means they look for respondents who behave like the cell-only users. According to a CDC survey, such people are more likely to rent, be under 25 years of age, live with roommates who are not relatives, and live in poverty.
Cell-only constituents could actually become a less distinct political force as the group grows larger. (According to the Pew study, the size of the cell-only group could reach 25 percent by the end of 2008.) As more people ditch land lines, the cell-only subset could start to resemble the general population.
Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.
Explainer thanks Mark Blumenthal of Pollster.com, Charles Franklin of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, and Scott Keeter of the Pew Research Center.
TODAY IN SLATE
Scalia’s Liberal Streak
The conservative justice’s most brilliant—and surprisingly progressive—moments on the bench.
Colorado Is Ground Zero for the Fight Over Female Voters
There’s a Way to Keep Ex-Cons Out of Prison That Pays for Itself. Why Don’t More States Use It?
The NFL Explains How It Sees “the Role of the Female”
The Music Industry Is Ignoring Some of the Best Black Women Singing R&B
Theo’s Joint and Vanessa’s Whiskey
No sitcom did the “Very Special Episode” as well as The Cosby Show.
The Other Huxtable Effect
Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.