Do all tax-cheats go to prison?

Answers to your questions about the news.
April 11 2006 5:58 PM

I Cheated on My Taxes

Am I going to prison?

Download the MP3 audio version of this story here, or sign up for The Explainer's free daily podcast on iTunes.

Investigators from the IRS announced fraud charges against several Chicago residents on Monday, April 10, just a week before the filing deadline for federal income taxes. Why do some tax-cheats go to prison, while others just have to pay a fine?

Because not all cases of fraud go to criminal court. The government doesn't have the time or money to launch criminal investigations into everyone it thinks has committed fraud, so investigators choose only the clearest—and, in many cases, the most high-profile—examples as their targets. The government only pursues criminal charges against a few thousand people every year. Civil tax proceedings are much more common, but they never result in prison sentences.

Daniel Engber Daniel Engber

Daniel Engber is a columnist for Slate


To prove that you're a criminal tax fraud, the government has to show beyond a reasonable doubt that you "willfully" disregarded the tax code—that you knew exactly what you were doing when you underpaid your taxes. * This sort of argument can be tricky for Justice Department lawyers, especially when they're trying to prosecute zealous "tax protesters" who believe (or claim to believe) that they don't owe any taxes at all.

Commercial airline pilot and longtime tax-evader John Cheek pushed this issue as far as it would go in 1991. Cheek defended himself against tax-fraud charges with the argument that his crime couldn't have been willful since he held a sincere conviction that he wasn't breaking the law. The judge responded by telling a befuddled lower-court jury that "an honest but unreasonable belief is not a defense," and Cheek was found guilty.

The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling that it's not for judges to decide whether someone's belief is "reasonable." The jury has to figure out if the defendant truly believes he's breaking the law, even if that belief is utterly ridiculous.

How might government lawyers prove what a tax-cheat truly believes? They can start by looking through his tax records for any sign that he knew his legal obligations. Had he filed returns in previous years? Did he make an effort to hide his income from the government?

Even if a tax-cheat escapes criminal prosecution, he could still face an audit and civil charges. In this case, the IRS would ask him to pay back-taxes plus interest. He could also get slapped with a penalty, depending on the nature of the misdeed. Once again, this depends on his intentions: The government will assess a 75 percent penalty if it can prove willful fraud before a tax judge. (In tax court, the government faces a more relaxed civil standard of proof).

The IRS deals out lesser penalties as well. You can get hit with a 20 percent "negligence" penalty if you didn't even try to follow the rules, or if you recklessly disregarded them. (The "my-tax-preparer-did-it" defense turns up again and again in response to these charges.) If enough money is at stake, the government doesn't even need to prove negligence: A nearly automatic 20 percent penalty applies to any "substantial underreporting" of your tax liability—i.e., if you underreport what you owe by more than $5,000.

Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.

Explainer thanks Jack Townsend of Townsend and Jones, L.L.P.



Crying Rape

False rape accusations exist, and they are a serious problem.

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

Why Men Can Never Remember Anything

The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 1:11 PM Why Men Can Never Remember Anything

The Music Industry Is Ignoring Some of the Best Black Women Singing R&B

How Will You Carry Around Your Huge New iPhone? Apple Pants!

Medical Examiner

The Most Terrifying Thing About Ebola 

The disease threatens humanity by preying on humanity.


The Other Huxtable Effect

Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.

There’s a Way to Keep Ex-Cons Out of Prison That Pays for Itself. Why Don’t More States Use It?

No, New York Times, Shonda Rhimes Is Not an “Angry Black Woman” 

Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 1:39 PM Shonda Rhimes Is Not an “Angry Black Woman,” New York Times. Neither Are Her Characters.
Sept. 19 2014 11:33 AM An Up-Close Look at the U.S.–Mexico Border
  News & Politics
Sept. 19 2014 1:56 PM Scotland’s Attack on the Status Quo Expect more political earthquakes across Europe.
Sept. 19 2014 12:09 PM How Accelerators Have Changed Startup Funding
Inside Higher Ed
Sept. 19 2014 1:34 PM Empty Seats, Fewer Donors? College football isn’t attracting the audience it used to.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 1:11 PM Why Men Never Remember Anything
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 19 2014 12:00 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? The Slatest editor tells us to read well-informed skepticism, media criticism, and more.
Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 2:44 PM Where Do I Start With Mystery Science Theater 3000?
Future Tense
Sept. 19 2014 12:38 PM Forward, March! Nine leading climate scientists urge you to attend the People’s Climate March.
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 19 2014 12:13 PM The Most Terrifying Thing About Ebola  The disease threatens humanity by preying on humanity.
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.