Making Sense of the Credit Debacle

The Press and "Social Silence"
E-mail debates of newsworthy topics.
March 4 2009 11:34 AM

Making Sense of the Credit Debacle

VIEW ALL ENTRIES

I do think the financial press has contributed to the current crisis. The media, collectively, should hang its head in shame. Yes, some of us spotted some elements of what was going on: At the FT, for example, my little team started wading through alphabet soup back in 2005, warning of the dangers of collateralized debt obligations/credit default swaps, etc. But we could have done much better in terms of pointing out the scale of problems and dangers. And many other mainstream media outlets totally ignored the story! That is not a good track record. In fact, to go back to my anthropology again, it is a classic area of "social silence" that served to keep elites in power, as an academic such as Pierre Bourdieu might say.

Journalists were not exclusively responsible for that social silence—the bankers and regulators did not want to talk, and the bankers often made it very hard to get information. I know: When my team started writing about this stuff, we had a huge challenge to get data and we were constantly criticized in 2005 and 2006 by senior bankers for our "unnecessarily negative" stance on the credit world. The financiers who were benefiting from the lack of scrutiny did not exactly invite questions.

Notwithstanding all that, I could have and should have rung alarm bells more loudly. So could have and should have the rest of the media. A situation in which most business journalists missed the biggest story for decades is not a good situation. I feel strongly that journalists need to recognize that collectively, or we too will lack credibility.

Gillian Tett is the Financial Times' U.S. managing editor.