Trayvon in Tulsa?
Parsing the uncomfortable connections between last week’s Oklahoma killings and the death of Trayvon Martin.
Handouts/Tulsa Police Department
After weeks of despairing over the decisions made by the Sanford, Fla., police who have failed to arrest George Zimmerman for the killing of Trayvon Martin, it’s a relief to hear that the police in Tulsa, Okla., seem to be handling last week’s frightening shootings there with careful professionalism.
On Friday morning, two men in a white pickup truck shot five people, perhaps chosen at random, in predominately black neighborhoods. Three were killed and two were injured. In the aftermath of this awful shooting spree, the Tulsa police formed a task force with more than two dozen local, state, and federal investigators. Their quick action netted a tip from Oklahoma’s Crime Stoppers program, and on Monday morning the police arrested 19-year-old Jacob England and his roommate, 32-year-old Alvin Watts, as suspects in the shootings.
In the aftermath of the crime, it also emerged that England had posted a desperate and racist message on Facebook about the shooting death of his father (which he blamed on a black man) and the suicide of his fiancée. “Today is two years that my dad has been gone shot by a f—— n—– it’s hard not to go off between that and sheran [his fiancée] I’m gone in the head,” he wrote.
England is a Native American who has called himself white and Watts is white, while all the victims were African-American. The police, though, have been wise to avoid calling the shootings hate crimes at this stage. It’s hard not to connect England’s racism to the acts of violence he allegedly committed, but it’s good policy for the police not to make pronouncements when facts are still being gathered.
At the same time, in the wake of this shooting and Trayvon Martin’s, it’s impossible not to ask questions about the role of race in vigilantism. It’s hard to imagine Zimmerman jumping to the conclusions he did if Martin was an unarmed white teenager. It’s also hard to fathom that England would open fire on a group of randomly targeted white people if he thought his father was killed by a white man. The African-American man who was a “person of interest” in England’s father’s death, Pernell Jefferson, is in prison for pointing a weapon, but wasn’t charged with the killing. According to the news coverage at the time in the Tulsa World, England died in a fight with Jefferson, after Jefferson allegedly tried to break into England’s daughter’s apartment. Jefferson is still facing charges relating to the altercation, of attempted burglary and felony firearms possession.
I asked Richard Thompson Ford, a Stanford law professor and Slate contributor, what he makes of the Tulsa shootings in combination with Trayvon Martin’s death. He pointed out that these killings give the lie to Justice Clarence Thomas’ claim that, in Ford’s words, “the Second Amendment is good for blacks because it allowed former slaves to defend themselves against racist vigilantes after emancipation.”
Ford is talking about Thomas’ opinion in last year’s Chicago gun control case, which applied to the states the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling that the Constitution protects an individual’s right to bear arms. Thomas invoked the era after Reconstruction, when “the use of firearms for self-defense was often the only way black citizens could protect themselves against mob violence." But Ford points out that today most of us, of all races, rely on the police for protection. “And despite their flaws,” Ford says, “I’d much prefer police with training and some psychological screening to be in control of the guns than vigilantes.”
You can think, then, of legislation like Florida’s Stand Your Ground law—which makes it all too easy to escape a murder conviction, or even charge, with a claim of self-defense—as imposing what Ford calls a “racial tax.” He says, “We can predict that the vigilantes these laws encourage are more likely to be reckless, incompetent, and frankly, racist, than the police.”
Oklahoma has a Stand Your Ground law as well, passed in 2006. Mediaite speculates that it’s because of that law that Pernell Jefferson wasn’t charged with shooting Carl England. I’m not sure that’s right, but it seems plausible—and it suggests that what we’re seeing in Tulsa is how Stand Your Ground laws not only get vigilantes off the hook but fuel the anger that drives them to begin with.
One of the fears in the wake of Martin’s death has been that people in Sanford will take justice into their own hands to avenge the teenager’s killing. Now in Oklahoma, in the person of Jacob England, we could be seeing just such an avenger. It’s scary enough to know that there are vigilantes in our midst. It’s scarier still to think that our public policy encourages them.
Emily Bazelon is a Slate senior editor and writes about law, family, and kids. Her forthcoming book, Sticks and Stones: Defeating the Culture of Bullying and Rediscovering the Power of Empathy and Character. Find her at firstname.lastname@example.org or on Facebook or Twitter.