Announcing the resignation of CIA Director George Tenet this morning, President Bush called Tenet "the kind of public servant you like to work with. He's strong, he's resolute. He's served his nation. ... He's been a strong leader in the war on terror."
It's a curious description, loud about good intentions and silent about bad results. There were plenty of strong, resolute public servants in the country's last vague, unending war, President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty. But Bush didn't cut them slack for service or resoluteness. "America began a war on poverty more than three decades ago, a story of good intention, but conflicted results," Bush observed two years ago. "Between 1965 and 1995, federal and state spending on poor and low income families increased from around $40 billion to more than $350 billion a year. Yet, during the same 30-year period we made virtually no progress—no progress—in reducing child poverty. And the number of children born out of wedlock grew from one in 13 to one in three."
Good government—a government responsible to the people whose dollars it takes to fund its operations—must have as its core purpose the achievement of results. No program, however worthy its goal and high-minded its name, is entitled to continue perpetually unless it can demonstrate it is actually effective in solving problems. In a results-oriented government, the burden of proof rests on each federal program and its advocates to prove that the program is getting results.
The war on terror, however, seems to be judged by a different standard. In his farewell message to CIA colleagues today, Tenet extolled the agency's warm fuzzies and noble purposes. "We have thrown our hearts into rebuilding our Intelligence Community," he effused. He lauded "our enduring efforts to build what we call ourselves—what I believe us to be—a true community." He concluded that he was leaving "with my head held very, very high, as yours should always be, because what you do is critical to everything our nation stands for: its goodness, its decency, and its courage."
Can the CIA's progress be measured by more than goodness, decency, and community? Why, yes, said Tenet. "American Intelligence has, after the drought of the post-Cold War years, begun to receive the investments in people and dollars and attention that we need. ... And I believe the American people will continue to demand that this great community of patriots receive the funding and support that you so richly deserve."
Measuring the value of programs by the amount of money spent on them? Isn't this what Bush criticized in the war on poverty? Perhaps, but money isn't the only thing Bush has given the agency. "He spends time with us almost every day," Tenet told his colleagues, evidently referring to briefings such as the one Bush disastrously failed to pursue on Aug. 6, 2001. "He has shown great care for our officers. He is a great champion for the men and women of US Intelligence and a constant source of support."
Well, OK. Bush has spent time, money, and "care" on the CIA. What has he got to show for it? "We have expanded and empowered our corps of analysts," Tenet said today. "We have restructured and streamlined our support operations. We have developed and acquired the technologies on which intelligence and espionage depend. With new schools and training facilities, we have sharpened instruction for each of our core professions. We are recruiting the finest men and women in our history in record numbers."
Sounds great. But as any conservative scholar of the war on poverty can tell you, these are internal measurements. They show where the money went. They don't show results outside the bureaucracy.
What has the CIA accomplished with all this expansion, empowerment, restructuring, streamlining, technology acquisition, and sharpened instruction? Tenet can't say. It's secret. "What you have achieved in this fight against a clever, fanatical enemy, around the world—the cells destroyed, the conspiracies defeated, the innocent lives saved—will for most Americans be forever unknown and uncounted," he told his colleagues. "But for those privileged to observe these often hidden successes, they will be an unforgettable testament to your dedication and your valor."
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself.
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?
The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.
Happy Constitution Day!
Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.