What's the Big Secret?

Are We Heading Back to the Bad Old Days?
An email conversation about the news of the day.
Aug. 30 2007 1:26 PM

What's the Big Secret?

VIEW ALL ENTRIES

I've really enjoyed this, guys. But I have a sneaking suspicion we haven't really answered the question in the title. Isn't there some quick and easy way to simply identify for our readers what this new law allows the NSA to do?

Apparently not. We've gone round and round, making all sorts of suppositions and counter-suppositions about what practices NSA has in mind, and also doing our level best to predict how DoJ and NSA lawyers might construe the words of this law. And the truth is, we really can't say for sure; and every time we look at it, we see new wrinkles, new ambiguities, greater mysteries … to the point where we're resorting to reading the tea leaves of an almost incomprehensible interview with the El Paso Times.

Advertisement

Isn't that the biggest, most fundamental problem with the Protect America Act? Here we are, a bunch of lawyers who have some grounding in this area—including one who just literally wrote the book (and I heartily recommend David's new volume)—and we've been parsing those 14 words in the new law ("surveillance directed at a person reasonably believed to be located outside of the United States") as closely as we can, poking and prodding for several weeks now, and all we can do is make wild guesses as to what it will mean in practice. Indeed, I'm fairly sure we have now examined the Protect America Act more closely than at least 525 or so legislators in town. And we're in the dark. So, what are the odds that anyonewho voted for this bill has any idea whatsoever what they have just authorized?

Whatever one thinks of FISA's ultimate compromises, that statute was a model of legislation compared to this one. It was enacted after four years of (mostly) open and detailed deliberation and debate. Every single phrase in it was publicly and microscopically examined by the administration and the Congress—with numerous examples in the written and oral testimony explaining what sorts of cases would be covered and excluded, and how. Countless witnesses testified as to FISA's possible interpretations and ways to clarify the statutory language; the legislative history, including committee reports, was extensive and very revealing; the statute contained detailed definitions of its terms of art; and Congress built in oversight roles for the courts and the legislature itself.

The new act? Passed in the dead of night, after some backroom meetings occurring over the space of a few nights, with no public deliberation, no legislative history (Justice Scalia will be thrilled!), and no definition of the key 14 words I noted above. It's enough to give sausage-making a good name.

There are only a few dozen people in this town who "know" how the Protect America Act will be construed … and they all work in the executive branch, which, not coincidentally, will be doing all the construing. In secret. Without substantial oversight or review. And without the vast majority of members of Congress having the foggiest notion of what it is they have authorized our government to do. How long before it's 1975 all over again?

TODAY IN SLATE

Doublex

Crying Rape

False rape accusations exist, and they are a serious problem.

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

I Bought the Huge iPhone. I’m Already Thinking of Returning It.

The Music Industry Is Ignoring Some of the Best Black Women Singing R&B

How Will You Carry Around Your Huge New iPhone? Apple Pants!

Medical Examiner

The Most Terrifying Thing About Ebola 

The disease threatens humanity by preying on humanity.

Television

The Other Huxtable Effect

Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.

Lifetime Didn’t Find the Steubenville Rape Case Dramatic Enough. So They Added a Little Self-Immolation.

No, New York Times, Shonda Rhimes Is Not an “Angry Black Woman” 

Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 1:39 PM Shonda Rhimes Is Not an “Angry Black Woman,” New York Times. Neither Are Her Characters.
Behold
Sept. 19 2014 1:11 PM An Up-Close Look at the U.S.–Mexico Border
  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 19 2014 9:15 PM Chris Christie, Better Than Ever
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 19 2014 6:35 PM Pabst Blue Ribbon is Being Sold to the Russians, Was So Over Anyway
  Life
Inside Higher Ed
Sept. 19 2014 1:34 PM Empty Seats, Fewer Donors? College football isn’t attracting the audience it used to.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 19 2014 12:00 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? The Slatest editor tells us to read well-informed skepticism, media criticism, and more.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 4:48 PM You Should Be Listening to Sbtrkt
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 19 2014 6:31 PM The One Big Problem With the Enormous New iPhone
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 19 2014 5:09 PM Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?   A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.