How Obama should give away his Nobel Prize money.

Advice on how to make the world better.
Dec. 23 2009 10:31 AM

A Nobel Goal

How President Obama should donate his Nobel Peace Prize winnings.

Do you have a real-life do-gooding dilemma? Please send it to and Sandy will try to answer it.

Dear Sandy,
President Obama just accepted the Nobel Peace Prize, which comes with an award of $1.4 million. The White House has announced that he will donate this money to charity. What is your recommendation for where this money should go?


Dear Caroline,

While President Obama's gift won't land him in the "Slate 60" list of top American philanthropists, it will bring a lot of attention—and scrutiny—to whichever cause he chooses. And though I'm under no illusion that he'll be looking to me for advice on which charity to choose, I'm happy to opine.

President Barack Obama accepting Nobel Prize.
President Barack Obama poses with his Nobel Peace Prize medal

As inspirational as the president's acceptance speech was, it didn't provide a lot of insight into which charity he'll pick. He managed to touch on every major global good in a matter of minutes: security, democracy, education, health, climate change, human rights. While I agree that all of these are integral to achieving peace, I think he should focus his donation on one issue that encapsulates his "call to action."

A prime candidate is nuclear nonproliferation, a lynchpin of Obama's foreign policy—and ostensibly one of the reasons he was awarded the prize in the first place: "The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons." The Ploughshares Fund is a grant-making organization that endows the "smartest people with the best ideas for preventing the spread and use of nuclear weapons and building stability in regions where nuclear weapons may be factors." That would be putting his money where his mouth is.

On the other hand, perhaps the president would be wise to continue to use his political influence on nuclear nonproliferation and put his money toward other forms of peace building. He acknowledged that peace "is not just freedom from fear, but freedom from want." If that's true, funding an organization aimed at addressing basic human needs would make inroads to  promote peace. So what about donating to a global health organization such as Partners in Health or the Global Fund To Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria? Or to organizations doing agricultural and business development, such as TechnoServe or Heifer International?

Then again, since Obama acknowledges that war and conflict are inevitable, maybe he should put his winnings toward organizations that try to alleviate their effects. Doctors Without Borders provides medical care in some of the world's most dangerous conflict zones—assisting people whose survival is threatened by violence, neglect, or catastrophe. The U.N. World Food Program provides food relief for refugee camps, therapeutic feeding centers, and other emergency shelters.

Finally, how can the president use this opportunity to make the largest statement? He could use his donation to challenge citizens to follow his "call to action" and donate in support of global peace. Dennis Whittle and Mari Kuraishi, former World Bank-ers and co-founders of Global Giving, urged the president to consider using his donation as a matching gift—an excellent idea.

No matter which charity he chooses or how he chooses to donate his winnings, Obama's biggest contribution will be in continuing to challenge people worldwide to remember his declaration that "for all the cruelty and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice." If he can persuade others to act charitably, it will be worth a lot more than $1.4 million.

Do you have a real-life do-gooding dilemma? Please send it to and Sandy will try to answer it.

Become a fan of Slate on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.



The Democrats’ War at Home

How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?

Congress’ Public Shaming of the Secret Service Was Political Grandstanding at Its Best

Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke

A Plentiful, Renewable Resource That America Keeps Overlooking

Animal manure.

Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10


Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.

How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.

Building a Better Workplace

You Deserve a Pre-cation

The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.

Hasbro Is Cracking Down on Scrabble Players Who Turn Its Official Word List Into Popular Apps

The Ludicrous Claims You’ll Hear at This Company’s “Egg Freezing Parties”

  News & Politics
Sept. 30 2014 9:33 PM Political Theater With a Purpose Darrell Issa’s public shaming of the head of the Secret Service was congressional grandstanding at its best.
Oct. 1 2014 8:34 AM Going Private To undertake a massively ambitious energy project, you don’t need the government anymore.
Atlas Obscura
Oct. 1 2014 10:32 AM The Corpse-Lined Hallways of the Capuchin Monastery Catacombs
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Sept. 30 2014 3:21 PM Meet Jordan Weissmann Five questions with Slate’s senior business and economics correspondent.
Brow Beat
Oct. 1 2014 10:44 AM Everyone’s Favorite Bob’s Burgers Character Gets a Remix You Can Dance to
Future Tense
Oct. 1 2014 10:27 AM 3,000 French Scientists Are Marching to Demand More Research Funding
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 1 2014 7:30 AM Say Hello to Our Quasi-Moon, 2014 OL339
Sports Nut
Sept. 30 2014 5:54 PM Goodbye, Tough Guy It’s time for Michigan to fire its toughness-obsessed coach, Brady Hoke.