At the end of our last article, "The Messy Room Dilemma," which was about deciding when to let an unwanted behavior slide and when to correct it, we promised to consider a related question: How do you decide whether to seek professional help in dealing with a child's misbehavior? Families come to the Yale Parenting Center and Child Conduct Clinic because they were referred by a school official or a pediatrician, because Family Services or a judge ordered them to, or because the parents decided on their own that they needed help managing their children's behavior. Even if parents are inclined to let a problem fade away on its own, and even if it's likely to, they're not always in a position to wait for nature to take its course. And once they decide—or have it decided for them—to do something to correct a problem, they may well find that they need help.
What sort of advice can we offer to parents who find themselves confronting the question of whether to seek professional help?
First, context is crucial, and the most obvious context is the age of the child. Shoplifting a candy bar, for instance, can mean very different things when the culprit is 4 and when he's 14.
One complexity in evaluating children's behavior is that they're changing so fast, presenting a moving target for your judgments about the relative seriousness of their problems. Still, judging behavior is, in practice, usually a matter of judging behavior in relation to the child's age. For example, not being toilet trained by age 5 is not a psychological calamity or even a problem, except that parents are understandably sick of changing diapers. More specifically, for children of 5 and under, bedwetting is not very significant in relation to current or future adjustment, but after the age of 10 it becomes a risk factor that may presage serious psychological problems. It's the same behavior, but the age changes its meaning. Not being fully toilet trained by 10 or 12 predicts later aggression. The same is true of fears—of darkness, monsters, separation from a parent—all of which are a normal part of development for most children, even when those fears really do bother them. But the fears usually go away on their own. If they don't, the same fear in middle or later childhood (10 to 12) could signify a more serious anxiety disorder.
There are other kinds of context beyond age, like the family's need for a child to function well in a particular setting. A toddler who takes a poke at another isn't really doing anything very worrisome, but if she does it one time too many and gets kicked out of the one affordable day care center in the neighborhood, then it can turn into a major problem for her working parents. While her behavior may not be a serious problem in the long run—preschool pugilism may well be a temporary phase she naturally outgrows—it's a problem in the context of her family's working and domestic lives, and so it may well have to be dealt with. The decision-making principle at work here is usually called "impairment." Does the child's behavior interfere with meeting the usual role expectations at home or at school? Many children have anxiety, fears, and tantrums, for instance, but does the problem interfere with going to school regularly?
Then there's historical context. A therapist in Alan's clinic had clients whose son made a YouTube video in which he playacted shooting his friends to death in a cursing rage after losing a board game. The parents wanted to focus on getting their son to complete his homework and clean his room, but the therapist told them that she was more concerned about the threat of violence in the video. They didn't share the therapist's alarm, and you might not, either. Boys, emulating the models provided by the world's movie industries, have been making violent home movies for as long as the technology has been available to them. What's the big deal? But the post-Columbine context changes the meaning of the behavior. For one thing, the string of school shootings in the past decade has made us more alert to rehearsing violence with peers as a danger sign; for another, it's easier now than it was in previous generations for a child to lay hands on the gun that allows him to turn the fantasy into reality. And even if you, the parent, still think the video is just harmless play, the other factor to bear in mind is that others will be alarmed. If neighbors and school officials get a look at it on YouTube, and they probably will, the prevailing ethos of zero tolerance ensures that your child's life and your own life are going to grow a lot more complicated in unwelcome ways. For all those reasons, it's not overreacting to deal with that behavior now—on your own terms, before you're forced to by drastic official acts like expulsion from school or mandatory referral to treatment.
So, a third principle: Danger and risk of danger. Is the child's behavior dangerous to himself or to others? This may involve aggressive behavior that could hurt others or self-injury. That's clear enough, but what if it's just talk? A child talking about killing himself or others must be taken seriously. The statements alone serve as a basis for seeking help or intervention. We're not saying that you have to haul your 4-year-old to the emergency room because he mimics a cartoon character saying "I could just die." Context matters, as usual. A young child may make an isolated statement or two, but the child seems fine at home, at school, and when playing with friends, and the statements disappear after a couple of days. That's one kind of context, and it would argue for just keeping an ear out for further statements. Another kind of reassuring context can be found in the minuscule suicide rate among the very young. But suicide attempts and suicide run in families, so that's part of the context, too, and it argues for alertness. And if a 12-year-old girl says the same thing, that's different. The suicide attempt and depression rates increase sharply with the onset of adolescence, especially for girls. Other context variables—not being involved with peers at school, the presence of a gun in the home, a "contagious" event in the media (a celebrity's recent suicide, for instance) that might inspire imitation—make the statement gain in seriousness until it's clear that you need to seek help for her. Danger to oneself or others is a special case in which you should err on the side of obtaining an evaluation. When in doubt, get a professional opinion.
TODAY IN SLATE
Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola
Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.
Why Are Lighter-Skinned Latinos and Asians More Likely to Vote Republican?
A Woman Who Escaped the Extreme Babymaking Christian Fundamentalism of Quiverfull
Subprime Loans Are Back
And believe it or not, that’s a good thing.
It Is Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice
In Defense of HR
Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.