It's Our Turn To Make a Baby
Should we wait to have a child because our in-laws recently miscarried?
Get "Dear Prudence" delivered to your inbox each week; click here to sign up. Please send your questions for publication to prudence@slate.com. (Questions may be edited.)
Got a burning question for Prudie? She'll be online at Washingtonpost.com to chat with readers each Monday at 1 p.m. Submit your questions and comments here before or during the live discussion.
Dear Prudence,
My sister-in-law recently suffered a miscarriage. Before the miscarriage, my husband and I were also planning to start a family. In fact, we were a little dismayed when my sister-in-law announced her pregnancy. I think we always assumed we'd have the first baby. We quickly got used to the idea, though, and were heartbroken for them when we learned about the miscarriage. My sister-in-law was so excited about becoming a mom, and I know they'll try to conceive again soon. My question is: Knowing what my sister-in-law has been through this year, is it insensitive for us to start trying for a baby before they conceive again? I'm afraid that my pregnancy could hurt my sister-in-law's feelings and damage our relationship, coming so soon after her personal tragedy. However the time is now for my husband and me to start our family. I'm just not sure that her miscarriage is a good reason to put our own lives on hold. I'm torn! Is there conception etiquette?
—Prenatal Jitters
Dear Prenatal Jitters,
No, there is no requirement that you call your friends and family from the phone by the bed and announce, "My basal body temperature indicates that I'm ovulating, but I just wanted to make sure it's OK with all of you if we produce a zygote tonight." They similarly don't have to notify you of their plans. Perhaps your ludicrous notion that people get to block out dates for fertilization comes from the misguided belief by some brides that they get to claim an entire season for their wedding, and only they should be allowed to marry during that window. However, people's reproductive decisions are their own business; no one defers to or takes precedence over anyone else. I'm actually having a hard time conceiving of what you mean by "conception etiquette," except that it's polite to make your conception event a private one, and that when you hear someone else's has succeeded you express your delighted good wishes at the pregnancy (and your sorrow if it ends in miscarriage).
—Prudie
Dear Prudence,
About a year ago, a couple with whom I was friends got engaged and moved away. I have known the groom for 15 years and have grown close to his fiancee, too. After they moved, they sent out informal wedding date cards. I responded by e-mail, letting them know that I would be at the wedding. "Phil" replied that he would be excited to see me. The plane ticket was a financial strain, but I got a good price. As the date came closer, I noted that I had not received a formal invitation. I called Phil, and he meekly explained that they had to trim the guest list. His bride did not want to give up any of her guests and forced him to give up some of his. I was shocked. I thought we were good friends. Furthermore, they know I am pinched for cash. I got no apology from either of them. Should I say something? Should I just drop it and assume we are not friends?
—Left Out in the Cold
Dear Left Out,
It's clear that Phil cares even less about saving your friendship than he did about the obligation incurred when he asked you to save the date—such a notice is sent out precisely to give guests the chance to make travel arrangements. His affront is compounded by the fact that you responded to the card (which you weren't required to do), so he knew you were making plans, expensive ones, to attend. I think you should send them a short note explaining your situation. Write that you were delighted to get the notice, and you booked nonrefundable and nontransferable airfare. Then when no invitation came, you were forced into the embarrassing position of having to call and find out you weren't invited. They can try to salvage this friendship by sending you an invitation with an abject apology in which they say they have behaved unforgivably but hope that you will forgive them because they would be honored and relieved to have you at the wedding. Most likely, however, they will conclude that you are selfishly subjecting them to more stress. After all, when you're planning a wedding, it's hard to decide which friends to treat like garbage. It could be that they are in a temporary sociopathic state some couples think they are entitled to as a kind of dowry. Maybe after the big day they will revert to being decent people. But unless they try to fix this, you won't know because your friendship is kaput. As you cool off, do take comfort that it is Phil, and not you, who is marrying someone of such contemptuous rudeness. ("Phil, I'm not disinviting anyone. You're the one with the expendable friends.") Likely the reason their "Save the Date" card became a "Save the Dis" card is because their expenses are out of control. So the bride and groom should return the gown and the tux, and wear something more economical and appropriate: sackcloth and ashes.
Photograph of Prudie by Teresa Castracane.



There Is Nothing Miraculous About a Tornado, Wolf Blitzer
A Huge Discovery About Prime Numbers—and What It Means for the Future of Math
Giving Poor Kids Computers Changes Nothing