HOME /  Dear Prudence :  Advice on manners and morals.

Maid of No Honor

9_dearprudence_01

Listen to a radio version of this piece on NPR's Day to Day.

Get "Dear Prudence" delivered to your inbox each week; click here to sign up. Please send your questions for publication to prudence@slate.com. (Questions may be edited.)



Dear Prudence,

I'd like your advice on how to handle a delicate situation. On my wedding day, the maid of honor appeared at the wedding nearly two and a half hours AFTER the ceremony was to have started, claiming to have been "lost." I saw this woman the night before, quite inebriated and barely able to stand. I find it hard to believe she was "lost." The trouble is that my wife wishes to continue being friendly with this person and insists that I do the same, holding back my annoyance at what I consider to be a wholly unacceptable gaffe. I suppose I have two questions. First, am I reasonable in refusing to be friendly with this woman? And second, if I must be in her company, how shall this faux pas be addressed? The wedding was three months ago.

—Annoyed Groom

Dear An,

The maid of honor sounds lost, all right ... most likely in a drunken reverie. If this person has been stone-cold sober on all other occasions, then you should accommodate your wife and chalk it up to one unfortunate episode and let it go. If she is habitually "lost," then your avoidance of her indeed seems reasonable. And either way, your displeasure need not be addressed at all. Given the particulars, it is your wife who should be put out—and she isn't. Go figure.

—Prudie, soberly



Dear Prudie,

I am 22 and recently met a 27-year-old man who seems to be wonderful. (I say "seems" because I've only known him a week.) He is attentive, has called me every day since we met, and genuinely seems to want to get to know me. My problem is that, in conversation, the subject of prostitution came up. I can assume from what he told me that he slept with prostitutes during his Navy days. This of course was an uncomfortable subject for him, and he didn't want to talk about it. I didn't push, but it bothers me. Granted, my past isn't exactly sparkling either, but I've never slept with someone in a foreign country for money! I also realize that what he did before me has nothing to do with me and, frankly, is none of my business. But it still bothers me. Should I just let it go and continue to try and have a relationship with him?

Advertisement

—Baffled

Dear Baff,

Prudie doesn't wish to seem overly permissive, but commerce with the world's oldest profession, while in the military, is not the worst thing she can think of—assuming the man is unmarried, of course. And you point out that YOU have never slept with someone in a foreign country for money. My dear, if you had, that would not be analogous to your new friend's situation at all. In the case you speak of, it is far better to be a buyer than a seller. So, yes, let it go and continue to see how the relationship develops.

—Prudie, maturely

Dear Prudence,

For the last few months, I have been contemplating writing you about this, and now I've decided that it can't hurt to seek advice. In my head I've been saying that it's none of my business, but that has been very hard lately. This has to do with my fiance's mother, "Jane," and the two men in her life. "Bob" and Jane went out for about 10 years. Bob is an alcoholic, a serial philanderer, and an all-around jerk. Why did Jane stay with him for 10 years? Bob is really rich. That just about sums up the type of person Jane is. So six months or so ago, Jane dumped Bob for cheating on her once too often and met "Joe." Joe is an incredibly nice man who is caring, attentive, loving, and fun. And when you see Jane and Joe together, they really seem happy. The problem Jane has with Joe is that he has a blue-collar job; he's an everyday Joe, if you will, and not able to provide the lifestyle Jane is used to and wants. Joe thinks Jane is a perfect angel, and he has proposed. Jane, however, is still talking with Bob, dating Bob, and Bob has proposed to her since Joe's proposal (apparently out of jealousy). Joe has no idea about the other man. I hear all this because Jane feels that since I'm to be her new "daughter," she can tell me everything. I am trying to be the nice future daughter-in-law and listen, but I also want to tell her that Bob is a jerk; that if she marries for money, she'll be miserable; and that Joe is wonderful. What I can't say to her is that I think she's a terrible person and I HATE that she is doing this to someone as nice as Joe. More then once I have had the urge to tell him, "Run!" I know it's not my place, but how can I let some poor man get his heart crushed like this?

—Saddened by What I Know

SINGLE PAGE
Page: 1 | 2
MYSLATE
MySlate is a new tool that you track your favorite parts Slate. You can follow authors and sections, track comment threads you're interested in, and more.

Photograph of Prudie by Allan Penn.