An Ice-Bound Observatory in Antarctica May Have Detected Neutrinos From Deep Space

New Scientist
Stories from New Scientist.
Jan. 18 2014 7:15 AM

Neutrino Time

The quirky particles come from some of the most violent phenomena in the universe.

A scientist enjoys the winter cold and darkness outside the Ice Cube Laboratory at Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, on August 17, 2012.
A scientist enjoys the winter cold and darkness outside the Ice Cube Laboratory at Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, in 2012.

Photo courtesy Sven Lidstrom/National Science Foundation

Ray Jayawardhana is professor of astrophysics at the University of Toronto, Canada, and author of The Neutrino Hunters.

Jon White: What's so interesting about neutrinos?
Ray Jayawardhana: They are elementary particles with rather quirky properties. They hardly ever interact with matter, and that makes them really difficult to pin down. Trillions pass through your body every second but there's only maybe a 25 percent chance that one will interact with an atom in your body in your whole lifetime.

JW: Where do they come from?
RJ: Some come from the heart of the sun; others are produced in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays hit atoms. Then there are geoneutrinos that are produced in the Earth's interior as radioactive elements decay. The vast majority of neutrinos that pass through Earth are from those three sources. But there's a great deal of interest in detecting neutrinos that come from much farther away—cosmic neutrinos.

Advertisement

JW: Why are cosmic neutrinos such a big deal?
RJ: Some of the more violent phenomena in the universe produce neutrinos. So there are some really fundamental questions that cosmic neutrinos allow us to probe. So far, though, only two batches have been detected. The first were from the supernova 1987A, a star that exploded in a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way. More recently, the IceCube neutrino observatory in Antarctica reported some 28 energetic neutrinos that are almost certainly cosmic in origin.

South Pole employees remove snow from the top of buildings during the winter darkness, on May 9, 2012.
South Pole employees remove snow from the top of buildings during the winter darkness, in 2012.

Photo courtesy Sven Lidstrom/National Science Foundation

JW: How significant was the IceCube detection?
RJ: It marks the beginnings of neutrino astronomy. Astronomy is not like other sciences; we usually don't get to put our quarry under the microscope or analyze it in the lab. We have to depend on feeble light from distant sources. By now, we've fairly well explored the electromagnetic spectrum. There are only two other potential cosmic messengers that we know of. One is gravitational waves, which still have not been detected directly. The other is cosmic neutrinos.

JW: Do the IceCube scientists know the precise origins of the neutrinos they saw?
RJ: Not yet. But the two candidate sources are the supermassive black holes at the hearts of galaxies and gamma-ray bursts, which are most likely produced by the deaths of incredibly massive stars.

JW: What else could cosmic neutrinos reveal?
RJ: There should have been neutrinos produced seconds after the big bang. With existing astronomy we can only look back to about 380,000 years after the big bang. If we could detect these "relic" neutrinos, we could look back to within seconds of the birth of the universe. The problem is that they are now low in energy, and therefore extremely difficult to detect. Present detectors are nowhere close to being sensitive enough to see them.

JW: Can neutrinos capture the public imagination in the same way as the Higgs boson?
RJ: The Higgs has been a terrific story. But neutrinos allow us to probe some really profound questions and I think that makes them truly interesting. They're ready to take center stage.

This article originally appeared in New Scientist.

The IceCube lab, illuminated by moonlight.
The IceCube lab, illuminated by moonlight.

Photo by Emanuel Jacobi/National Science Foundation

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

The Irritating Confidante

John Dickerson on Ben Bradlee’s fascinating relationship with John F. Kennedy.

My Father Invented Social Networking at a Girls’ Reform School in the 1930s

Renée Zellweger’s New Face Is Too Real

Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band

Can it be again?

The All The President’s Men Scene That Captured Ben Bradlee

Medical Examiner

Is It Better to Be a Hero Like Batman?

Or an altruist like Bruce Wayne?

Technology

Driving in Circles

The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.

The World’s Human Rights Violators Are Signatories on the World’s Human Rights Treaties

How Punctual Are Germans?

  News & Politics
Politics
Oct. 22 2014 12:44 AM We Need More Ben Bradlees His relationship with John F. Kennedy shows what’s missing from today’s Washington journalism.
  Business
Moneybox
Oct. 21 2014 5:57 PM Soda and Fries Have Lost Their Charm for Both Consumers and Investors
  Life
The Vault
Oct. 21 2014 2:23 PM A Data-Packed Map of American Immigration in 1903
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 21 2014 3:03 PM Renée Zellweger’s New Face Is Too Real
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 21 2014 1:02 PM Where Are Slate Plus Members From? This Weird Cartogram Explains. A weird-looking cartogram of Slate Plus memberships by state.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 21 2014 9:42 PM The All The President’s Men Scene That Perfectly Captured Ben Bradlee’s Genius
  Technology
Technology
Oct. 21 2014 11:44 PM Driving in Circles The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.
  Health & Science
Climate Desk
Oct. 21 2014 11:53 AM Taking Research for Granted Texas Republican Lamar Smith continues his crusade against independence in science.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.