Floating cities: Seasteaders want to build their own islands.

We’re Fresh Out of Deserted Islands, So Seasteaders Want To Build Their Own

We’re Fresh Out of Deserted Islands, So Seasteaders Want To Build Their Own

New Scientist
Stories from New Scientist.
Sept. 29 2012 8:06 AM

Floating Cities? Bon Voyage, Rich Libertarians.

Seasteads will be communes for the wealthy.

Seasteadign Design.
A seasteading design

Courtesy Anthony Ling.

Floating cities could become a reality if "seasteaders" like George Petrie have their way. The naval architect is director of engineering for the Seasteading Institute, a nonprofit firm founded in 2008 to create floating communities. He says havens far out at sea could redefine human existence.

Jon White: What exactly is seasteading?
George Petrie: Who among us has not looked at the current dysfunctional state of political systems and wished, "If only there were a deserted island where we could start over again." The bad news is there are no deserted islands that are not claimed by a jurisdiction, so the only way to have one is to build your own. That's what the seasteading community is hoping to facilitate.

We don't pretend to have the answers to how that island will be governed. We are trying to set up a laboratory that other people can use to do those experiments, to home in on the best sets of rules. It's like the communes of the 1960s: We're going to start with a bunch of like-minded individuals and create our own paradise. That probably sounds terribly retro, but I think that's where the populist appeal stems from; it's that same yearning.


JW: Does everyone view floating cities in a utopian light?
GP: No. From the libertarian point of view, it means freedom from taxes and the oppressive thumb of burdensome regulation, plus the ability to pursue enterprises that would not be possible onshore.

JW: Why not just take off to some tract of unoccupied land?
GP: There's a difference between "not occupied" and "not controlled." Unoccupied areas have the same laws, the same regulations as inhabited areas.

JW: Do people really want to live on the ocean?
GP: People love living there already. They take cruises because they just love being on the ocean. Hundreds of thousands of people spend time on sailboats and buy beachfront property. The water has a certain allure.

JW: Cynics might say that you'll end up creating offshore tax havens rather than paradise-like communities that nurture people?
GP: The seasteading movement needs to be wary of being perceived as simply offshore tax havens or even venues for money laundering or depots for arms merchants. It's very important that we be perceived as undertaking activities that are for the benefit of humankind, as opposed to skirting the law.

JW: How did you get involved in the cause?
GP: I taught naval architecture for over 25 years and recently hung up the chalk. Also, at the end of 2009, I attended a conference in Shanghai. Most of the presentations were boring engineering stuff, but one was entitled "floating cities at sea." By the time it finished I was jumping up and down in my seat asking how I could get involved. Three weeks later I got a call from the Seasteading Institute inviting me to become their director of engineering.

JW: The institute did a study that identified possible locations for the first cities at sea: off Brazil, the Galapagos, and West Africa. Why were those chosen?
GP: Many thought that this study would be the definitive starting point for identifying the locations we should look at. For me, it's just a tool. You're going to get a different answer depending on how you define what's important to you. It's a bit like asking where is the best place to build a city: Is it going to be an industrial city, a research hub, or a natural resources hub? How you address those questions is going to significantly change the answer you get. If your business model is based on aquaculture as opposed to medical tourism or deep-sea mining, you're going to get different answers.