The Taliban just killed the humans who guide our drones.

Science, technology, and life.
Jan. 4 2010 7:52 AM

Bleed the Machines

The Taliban just killed the humans who guide our drones.

MQ-9 Reaper drone. Click image to expand.
An MQ-9 Reaper drone

In the war between humans and machines, the humans have found a new way to strike back.

William Saletan William Saletan

Will Saletan writes about politics, science, technology, and other stuff for Slate. He’s the author of Bearing Right.

I'm not talking about a science-fiction shootout between Hollywood heroes and rogue cyborgs, like TheTerminator. I'm talking about the real-life battle going on today in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The unmanned aerial vehicles engaged in this battle—drones—aren't alien or autonomous. They're built, deployed, and controlled by the United States. In the last year, they've hit al-Qaida and the Taliban with more than 50 fatal missile strikes. By some accounts, the militants are so rattled that they're abandoning the mountains and moving to Pakistani cities, hoping the drones won't dare to strike there.

The drones have revolutionized warfare. They let us hunt and kill our enemies abroad without occupying foreign lands or risking our lives. We fire our weapons from the security of remote consoles.

How can our enemies fight back? By targeting the machines' weak link: us.

The drones depend on human input. They need human authorization to fire. And to find enemy honchos and hideouts, they need targeting intelligence from human informants on the ground. Two years ago, the insurgents took aim at both of these inputs. They accused local people of scouting targets for the drones and butchered them in public to deter such spying. They also set off bombs in Pakistan to intimidate the Pakistani government into demanding an end to the drone strikes. But Pakistan didn't buckle, and the drone strikes have increased in tempo and precision. Apparently, the drones' managers have found plenty of new spies to replace the dead ones.

Advertisement

Now the Taliban seem to have come up with a new strategy: using the drones' human intelligence networks to infiltrate the program and kill the people who run it.

Last week, a suicide bomber blew up seven CIA officers at a U.S. military base in Afghanistan near the Pakistan border. It looked like just another insurgent attack. But it was more than that. In separate interviews, representatives of two Taliban factions have claimed that the mission's target was the drone program. "We attacked this base because the team there was organizing drone strikes," a commander allied with the Afghan Taliban told the Wall Street Journal. He said the attack was timed to kill the woman who led the team, since the Taliban knew she would be there that day. A Pakistani Taliban commander told the AP a similar story and added that the bomber was recruited as a "CIA agent" but turned against the agency.

Well, the Taliban say a lot of things. But in interviews with the Journal, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, current and former U.S. officers confirm the main elements of the story. U.S. personnel at the Afghan base were closely engaged in selecting drone targets in Pakistan. And they did this job, in part, by recruiting and interviewing informants on site. That would explain why the bomber targeted them and how he got in.

According to at least three reports, the bomber was recruited as an informant, invited to the base, and allowed past an initial checkpoint without being searched. Why wasn't he searched? One reason, the Journal reports, is that the base's CIA officers limit searches of such recruits "in the hopes of establishing trust." Another reason is speed. A former intelligence officer calls the incident an "asset meeting gone bad" and explains the lax search protocol as part of the CIA officers' strategy: "They felt the need to gather viable, time-sensitive intelligence was so pressing that it justified the trade-off."

Time-sensitive intelligence. That's the key phrase. The reason you don't make people go through a lot of screening to get into your facility is that their information might be hot. Who needs such hot information? The drones. Two minutes' delay can cost them a clean shot at a Taliban or al-Qaida commander.

Drone operators aren't the only ones who need such tips. U.S. special forces in Afghanistan rely on them, too. If drones weren't the bomber's target, he might have struck the CIA base because it was orchestrating a special-forces campaign against the Taliban-allied Haqqani network. One U.S. official told the Journal that CIA personnel thought the bomber had intel on the Haqqanis. We'll see how the evidence plays out.

Either way, it appears that the bomber used our intelligence-gathering system to slip into the base and kill the people who orchestrated the intelligence gathering. In so doing, he delivered the worst blow ever suffered by the drone program. He found the flesh in our unmanned air force, seduced it, and slaughtered it.

Score one for the bad guys. The next move is ours.

Human Nature's latest short takes on the news, via Twitter:

Latest Twitter Updates
    Follow William Saletan on Twitter.

    Become a fan of Slate on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

    TODAY IN SLATE

    The World

    How Canada’s Shooting Tragedies Have Shaped Its Gun Control Politics

    Where Ebola Lives Between Outbreaks

    Gunman Killed Inside Canadian Parliament; Soldier Shot at National Monument Dies

    Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band

    Can it be again?

    Paul Farmer: Up to 90 Percent of Ebola Patients Should Survive

    Is he right?

    Science

    “I’m Not a Scientist” Is No Excuse

    Politicians brag about their ignorance while making ignorant decisions.

    Technology

    Driving in Circles

    The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.

    In Praise of 13th Grade: Why a Fifth Year of High School Is a Great Idea 

    PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer

      News & Politics
    The World
    Oct. 22 2014 11:57 AM Why Wasn't the WHO Ready for Ebola?
      Business
    Continuously Operating
    Oct. 22 2014 2:38 PM Crack Open an Old One A highly unscientific evaluation of Germany’s oldest breweries.
      Life
    Gentleman Scholar
    Oct. 22 2014 5:54 PM May I Offer to Sharpen My Friends’ Knives? Or would that be rude?
      Double X
    The XX Factor
    Oct. 22 2014 4:27 PM Three Ways Your Text Messages Change After You Get Married
      Slate Plus
    Tv Club
    Oct. 22 2014 5:27 PM The Slate Walking Dead Podcast A spoiler-filled discussion of Episodes 1 and 2.
      Arts
    Brow Beat
    Oct. 22 2014 3:06 PM Writer William Giraldi Wishes Everyone Would Please Stop Likening Him to a Literary Genius
      Technology
    Future Tense
    Oct. 22 2014 2:59 PM Netizen Report: Twitter Users Under Fire in Mexico, Venezuela, Turkey
      Health & Science
    Wild Things
    Oct. 22 2014 2:42 PM Orcas, Via Drone, for the First Time Ever
      Sports
    Sports Nut
    Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.