States are banning alcohol inhalers. The devices, which start at $300, vaporize booze so you can get a faster buzz. Seventeen states have banned them; seven more are considering it. Liquor companies and drug czars are pushing the laws. Banners' arguments: 1) Inhalers "could encourage alcohol abuse and drunk driving." 2) They could evade laws that ban kids from "drinking" alcohol but not inhaling it. 3) They have "no purpose other than to get you drunk," bypassing "the tactile pleasures of drinking wine with a fine meal." Rebuttals: 1) Liquor companies and their pet politicians are using the bans to block competition. 2) Liquid booze also encourages abuse and drunk driving. 3) Remind us what Thunderbird and Colt 45 have to do with fine meals? 4) The inhalers don't even get you drunk. (For Human Nature's take on alcohol, Mark Foley, and Mel Gibson, click here.)
Latest Human Nature columns: 1) Mark Foley's alcohol rehab. 2) Pro-lifers against contraception. 3) The first penis transplant. 4) Is eugenics better than sex? 5) Buried alive in your own skull. 6) The global explosion of fat. 7) The case for genital mutilation. 8) The delusion of air conditioning. 9) Stop killing meat and start growing it. 10) The war on tanning.
TODAY IN SLATE
Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola
Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.
Why Are Lighter-Skinned Latinos and Asians More Likely to Vote Republican?
A Woman Who Escaped the Extreme Babymaking Christian Fundamentalism of Quiverfull
Subprime Loans Are Back
And believe it or not, that’s a good thing.
It Is Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice
In Defense of HR
Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.