What Would Happen If We Nuked the Moon?

Answers to your questions about the news.
Nov. 30 2012 6:17 PM

Goodnight, Moon

What would happen if we detonated a nuclear device on the lunar surface? Would it push the moon out of orbit?

The moon.
Could humans put the mother of all craters of the moon's surface?

Photo by Comstock.

The U.S. Air Force considered detonating a nuclear device on the moon during the late 1950s. In a recent interview with CNN, physicist Leonard Reiffel, who worked on the project, explained that the single explosion would have been “microscopic” with little impact on the moon. But what if it had been bigger—do we have enough nuclear weapons to push the moon out of orbit?

Not even close. Depending on where the detonation happened, sending the moon careening away from Earth would take somewhere between 10 billion and 10 trillion megatons of TNT. The most powerful nuclear device ever detonated, the Soviet Union’s “Tsar Bomba,” yielded the energy equivalent of 50 megatons of TNT. The combination of every nuclear device ever tested represents just over 500 megatons of TNT worth of energy, and the current nuclear arsenal of the world could produce less than 7,000 megatons. In other words, to move the moon out of its orbit, humanity would have to strike it in precisely the right location with a force 1.5 million times greater than our collective nuclear arsenal. (And that’s assuming that every joule of energy from the warheads would be transferred to the moon’s motion—an absolute impossibility.)

The moon is constantly edging away from us, though, without any human intervention. The moon’s pull drags a portion of the Earth’s water out of its natural position, creating bulges at each end of the planet. As Earth rotates, these bulges exert a force on the moon, dragging it through orbit and adding to the moon’s kinetic energy. As the moon gains energy, its orbit grows ever larger. On average, the moon floats 3 or 4 centimeters farther away every year.

Advertisement

Life without the moon would be strange in the near term and disastrous in the long term. With only the sun influencing the tides, high tide would come at noon and midnight every day. Changes in tides could significantly affect ocean currents and weather. Ocean levels would change globally, as water moved from the equator toward the poles. Modern society no longer relies on moonlight for harvesting and other nighttime activities, but several animal species base their decisions on the moon. Some sea turtle hatchlings use moonlight to direct them on their dangerous crawl to the sea. Snowshoe hares, among other small animals, appear more likely to stay at home on moonlit nights, suggesting the moon is crucial to predators. Owls talk more, and more loudly, when the moon is out.

Over the scale of thousands or millions of years, things would also get very wobbly on our planet. Currently, as the Earth spins on its axis and revolves around the sun, it remains tilted at approximately a 23.5-degree angle. This tilt is responsible for the seasons, as different locations on Earth are oriented differently toward the sun depending on the time of year. If the stabilizing influence of the moon disappeared, the Earth would begin to teeter dramatically on its axis, perhaps as much as 60 degrees. (Mars experiences a major wobble because it lacks a large moon.) The seasons would no longer be constant, and the variability in seasons would increase substantially. It’s even possible, although unlikely, that the Earth could topple over, especially if struck by a large object. Some researchers believe that’s what happened to Uranus, which orbits the sun on its side.

Got a question about today’s news? Ask the Explainer.

Explainer thanks Jim Bell of Arizona State University, Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology, and Chris Mihos of Case Western Reserve University.

Brian Palmer writes about science, medicine, and the environment for Slate and the Natural Resources Defense Council. Email him at explainerbrian@gmail.com. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case

The Jarring Experience of Watching White Americans Speak Frankly About Race

How Facebook’s New Feature Could Come in Handy During a Disaster

The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented

Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada

View From Chicago

You Should Be Able to Sell Your Kidney

Or at least trade it for something.

Space: The Next Generation

An All-Female Mission to Mars

As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.

Terrorism, Immigration, and Ebola Are Combining Into a Supercluster of Anxiety

The Legal Loophole That Allows Microsoft to Seize Assets and Shut Down Companies

  News & Politics
Propublica
Oct. 17 2014 4:21 PM Why the Poor Pay $1,400 for Old iPads #MuckReads: A weekly roundup of investigative reporting from ProPublica.
  Business
Business Insider
Oct. 19 2014 11:40 AM Pot-Infused Halloween Candy Is a Worry in Colorado
  Life
Outward
Oct. 17 2014 5:26 PM Judge Begrudgingly Strikes Down Wyoming’s Gay Marriage Ban
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 17 2014 1:54 PM Republican Midterm Debate Strategy: Be Pro-Life, But Not Anti-Abortion
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Oct. 17 2014 1:33 PM What Happened at Slate This Week?  Senior editor David Haglund shares what intrigued him at the magazine. 
  Arts
Behold
Oct. 19 2014 4:33 PM Building Family Relationships in and out of Juvenile Detention Centers
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 17 2014 6:05 PM There Is No Better Use For Drones Than Star Wars Reenactments
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 19 2014 7:30 AM Persistence Pays Off: The Smoking Trail of a Shooting Star
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 16 2014 2:03 PM Oh What a Relief It Is How the rise of the bullpen has changed baseball.