There was a moment three or four years ago when the media could not stop talking about how miserable parents were—especially mothers. We prefer doing pretty much anything to taking care of our offspring (even housework!), we get less sleep, and we’re more depressed than adults without kids. But, as most parents will tell you, the experience of parenting also provides moments of transcendent, uncomplicated glee: the giggle you share with your toddler, watching your 7-year-old master a math problem, a gossipy lunch with your young adult.
As the parent of a toddler, New York magazine contributing editor Jennifer Senior felt the innate contradiction between the highs and lows of parenting keenly and sought to explain it in her 2010 New York cover story, “All Joy and No Fun.” The piece was a hit, and now it’s a book, also called All Joy and No Fun, out Tuesday.
The book isn’t prescriptive. Senior isn’t admonishing parents to be more mindful or trying to convince them that if they just get more sleep, they’ll be happier and more successful. But it does explain the roots, development, and state of modern parenting culture in a more comprehensive and well-researched way than I’ve seen.
Up until the 20th century, parents’ roles were clearly defined, and so were their children’s. You had children because you needed someone to work the farm, so you taught your kid to be a farmer, and that child provided labor to the family. But once having a child became a choice rather than a necessity and children were no longer providing economic support to their families, the roles got scrambled and remain fraught. When becoming a parent became a choice, we also expected more from the role. As Senior puts it, we’re regarding children “as sources of existential fulfillment rather than as ordinary parts of our lives.”
I talked to Senior at a coffee shop in Park Slope, Brooklyn, N.Y. We discussed why parenting has become even crazier in the past 30 years, the dangers in the pursuit of happiness, and the surprisingly violent urges of teenage girls.
Slate: In the book, you outline how parenting fundamentally changed in the past century or so. But it seems like the craziness has accelerated over the past 30 years. I look at my mom’s experience of parenting, and there didn’t seem to be the same expectations of parental happiness, and there weren’t the same pressures on parents to spend so much time cultivating their children. Do you think things have changed even more dramatically in the past few decades, and if so, why?
Jennifer Senior: I can give two answers. The first thing is parents don’t realize they’re living in the middle of a historic transition, which is to say only since the 1950s did the old roles go away. Kids used to work. They worked on their family’s behalf. Just to give it a precise point in time, in 1940, only half of all American teenagers graduated from high school. That was the tipping point. Right on the eve of the war. Until then, 51 percent or more of teenagers were still working and kicking in money to their families. Which to me is astounding.
What that means is, the first main thing that changed in the wake of the Second World War is we had this sheltered childhood. Kids weren’t wage earners. And absent kids being wage earners, you have to figure out what the kid does and what you have to do. And after the war years, there was this unprecedented prosperity. You could raise your kid on one wage. This is just a guess, but maybe some of the old attitudes were still there at that point; kids weren’t fully sentimentalized.
Now we’re in this place where we just know two things: We have to nurture our kids for a future we can’t see, and we have to shore up their self-esteem because we’ve decided that they’re special and they’re vulnerable. Ever since self-esteem became a goal, and it started to become a goal in the 1970s with Free to Be You and Me and all that, was the moment kids became fully precious. In the 20th century, one of the triumphs, but also one of its sorry outcomes, was we all decided human happiness became achievable.
Let’s say it first started in the ’50s, and then there was an acceleration in the ’70s when women first went to work, and there was this misplaced idea that happiness above all else was what we wanted for ourselves, but also for our children.
But I think that the biggest acceleration is globalization. So let’s say the ’90s. Because then you’re trying to prepare your kids for a future you can’t see, which was the Margaret Mead reasoning. When I was in high school in the late ’80s, the idea was we all had to learn Japanese. That didn’t turn out to be the case. So now it’s like, every kid needs to learn Mandarin, and it seems to be true sitting from here, but I don’t know.
Slate: Another thing that struck me about your book is how much more time parents spend parenting than they used to. I remember a stat from your book about how only a very small percentage of children said they wished they saw their mothers and fathers more often. Is all this time spent on child care doing anything other than making parents unhappy?
Senior: This is a body of literature that I didn’t drill very deeply into, because as you point out, it’s about the children, and my book is about the parents. But there’s a huge body of literature that seems to be emerging saying that being overweening and being overhelicoptering is backfiring. In terms of precisely the things I was just talking about: self-esteem. There was that Middlebury sociologist [Margaret K. Nelson, the author of Parenting Out of Control] who wrote that too many hours was working out the wrong way. I don’t read all those books because I’m over it, but there’s plenty of evidence that having a depressed parent is bad for you.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Budget Disaster that Sabotaged the WHO’s Response to Ebola
Are the Attacks in Canada a Sign of ISIS on the Rise in the West?
PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer
Is It Offensive When Kids Use Bad Words for Good Causes?
Fascinating Maps Based on Reddit, Craigslist, and OkCupid Data
The Real Secret of Serial
What reporter Sarah Koenig actually believes.
The Actual World
“Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.