In Chicago Boys, the story of Chilean economists who studied in America and then remade their country.

The “Boys” Who Completely Transformed Chile’s Economy

The “Boys” Who Completely Transformed Chile’s Economy

Commentary about business and finance.
Jan. 12 2016 6:49 PM

The Boys Who Got to Remake an Economy

They embraced free-market economics in America. Then Chile’s dictator let them transform an entire society.

160104_$BOX_Chicago-Boys
Chicago Boys circa 1957, left to right: Luis Arturo Fuenzalida, Alberto Valdés, Larry Sjaastad, Pedro Jeftanovic, and Sergio de Castro.

Photo by Ernesto Fontaine

“Chile was not a jewel in 1995, but it’s a jewel today,” the economist Arnold Harberger says in the documentary Chicago Boys. Harberger, an American economist who taught at the University of Chicago from 1953 to 1991 alongside Milton Friedman, was a father figure to the “boys”—a group of Chilean economists who studied at the university in the 1950s. There, they became enthusiastic converts to Friedman’s free-market economic philosophies, which they were then given free rein to implement on an unprecedented scale during Augusto Pinochet’s dictatorship of Chile. The ideas they brought home from Chicago changed Chilean society forever and made it one of the richest countries in Latin America.

But in 2011, amid massive protests by Chilean students against economic inequality and the rising costs of higher education, journalist Carola Fuentes began to realize that something was changing. “Until then, Chileans always felt proud about our economic success,” Fuentes told me in a phone interview from Chile. “What was happening? Why were Chilean people unhappy? We decided to ask that question to the people who invented our economic model: the Chicago Boys.”

Advertisement

The movie, which opened in Chile in November and was directed by Fuentes along with filmmaker Rafael Valdeavellano, explains how Chile ended up implementing the most extreme version of Friedman’s doctrines, while arguing that Chile’s audacious economic experiment was in many ways a field test for the ideas later put into practice by sympathetic leaders like Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.

“A lot of things, such as the privatization of the pension system, for example, were discussed in the United States a long time after being implemented in Chile,” Fuentes said. “But I’ve lived in the U.S., and there’re big differences. [Americans] also have a lot of inequality and abusive practices of businessman, but it’s not as extreme as in Chile.”

The film recounts how in 1956 the University of Chicago and Santiago’s Universidad Católica—with the help of Ford Foundation—signed an exchange agreement to send young economics students to the United States to learn more about “monetarism,” the theory that governments should refrain from regulating the market, whenever possible, with the exception of managing the money supply. The idea, radical in the United States for years following the New Deal, was developed by Friedman in the 1940s and under his leadership of Chicago’s economics department became the intellectual center of free-market economics in America. “This exchange was part of the State Department’s investment plan to expand their influence in Latin America, in a moment when they were concerned about the growth of Soviet ideas in the region. It is clear evidence of America’s foreign-policy influence in Chile,” Fuentes told me.

Around 25 Chilean students came to Chicago between 1956 and 1961. Some of them bought video cameras, an unimaginable purchase in Chile in those years, and recorded their time in Chicago, footage that is used in the film. They filmed their parties, their study sessions, and their walks around the campus. They recorded their everyday lives as normal students, long before they became the economic leaders of Chile’s military government.    

Advertisement

Back in Chile, the Chicago Boys hoped to implement some of what they had learned in America. So they started to build an economic program, which they presented to the presidential candidate Jorge Alessandri, who lost to the Socialist Salvador Allende in 1970.

During Allende’s rule, the Chicago Boys continued working on their economic project, which was finally named el ladrillo—the brick, because it was so big. Chicago alum Sergio de Castro authored their final recommendation, which they delivered to Navy Admiral José Toribio Merino.

Merino would be part of the junta that overthrew Allende in a CIA-backed coup in 1973, installing Gen. Augusto Pinochet as the new head of state. De Castro became the economic minister and later the treasury minister. The other Chicago Boys also joined the military government, occupying Cabinet positions during the 17 years of dictatorship.

Their program centered on reductions to fiscal spending to solve high inflation and economic difficulties. They opened the economy to foreign imports, privatized dozens of state companies, and removed most government controls on private economic activity. At the same time, as it was opening up the Chilean economy, the regime was clamping down on political opposition. In Pinochet’s nearly 20 years in power, thousands of people were killed or “disappeared.”

Advertisement

But while it came under heavy human rights criticism, Chile was the first country to apply Friedman’s economic principles, and, years later, the famous economist called this process, lead by his disciples, “the Miracle of Chile.” Friedman himself visited Chile and met with Pinochet in 1975, where he praised the economic measures taken by the Chicago Boys and Pinochet’s government. The connection with the dictator has been one of the most controversial aspects of Friedman’s legacy in the United States.

To Carola Fuentes, Chile was the first (and most radical) experiment in what we call now neoliberalism: “We helped to shape the economy of other countries. You can’t imagine Margaret Thatcher’s reforms, in the United Kingdom, and Ronald Reagan’s, in the United States, without Chile.” She adds that the Chicago Boys remain proud of how they changed Chile, even as high-profile corruption cases have caused many Chileans to lose faith in a largely self-regulated market: “They can’t understand why Chileans are not thankful for what they did.”

Pinochet stepped down in 1990 after his government was overwhelming rejected by the Chilean people in a constitutional referendum. But in the years since, the economic system implemented by the Chicago Boys has mostly remained in place. Democratic governments after Pinochet have maintained their politics mostly intact and only in recent years, particularly during Socialist Party President Michelle Bachelet’s second term, have some steps been taken to reform labor rights, pensions, and the health and education systems, as well as implement for financial regulations. These change have met major resistance from conservative groups. Nowadays, many Chileans believe that the dictatorship primarily made the people close to it very rich, at the cost of the rest of the population. That rage boiled over into the recent protests.

Yes, Chile’s economy has grown large, but for whom? asks Fuentes. “Most Chileans have to go into debt paying for education, health, to move around the highways, etc. The rights and benefits of Chilean workers are few and most of the time not respected by employers.” Fifty percent of Chileans have a monthly salary under $445 dollars, while the top 0.1 percent receive almost $900,000. Chileans’ frustration with their system will go on, says Fuentes. “Chicago Boys believe that their reforms helped Chile’s economy to grow, but if we discuss development in a more multidimensional way, I think we’re really behind.”

Chicago Boys won best direction in the International Film Festival of Santiago before opening in Chilean theaters on Nov. 5. (In two-and-a-half months, it became the second-most-viewed documentary in the country last year.) The production is now looking to distribute the film in the United States—the country where Chile’s “miracle” was born.

Tania Opazo is a science reporter at La Tercera, a national newspaper in Chile, and a former International Center for Journalists fellow at Slate.