If electronic books are the future—literary volumes optimized for the Kindle, the Sony Reader, the iPhone—how come two of this fall's hottest books won't be available in digital form anytime soon? Sen. Ted Kennedy's memoir, True Compass, had a dead-tree print run of 1.5 million but a pixel-version print run of zero. (It's currently No. 1 on the New York Times best-seller list.) Now comes word that Sarah Palin's memoir, Going Rogue, which will debut in November with a print run of 1.5 million copies, will not be available as an e-book until Dec. 26.
What gives? After all, other blockbusters, such as Dan Brown's The Lost Symbol or Mitch Albom's Have a Little Faith (or, as I refer to it, Sundays with Schmaltzie) don't discriminate among readers. Jonathan Karp, editor of the Kennedy memoir, cited the difficulty of translating photos into the new format as a reason not to do an e-version. But such concerns didn't stand in the way of publishing an audio version of True Compass. Why shut out a group of buyers from purchasing the product? And why isn't Amazon.com, which possesses immense leverage over publishers as a big purveyor of plain old books and the dominant seller of e-books, making more of a stink?
The answer lies in the types of books these are and in the not-always-rational price difference between e-books and hardcovers.
The Kennedy and Palin autobiographies are big, event books that appeal to passionate supporters. The Daily Kos crowd won't go rogue in big numbers, and the National Review gang has no interest in finding its true compass. As a result, the books offer an increasingly rare opportunity for publishers to help out struggling bricks-and-mortar booksellers. In the most recent quarter, same-store sales at Borders fell 18 percent. Same-store sales at Barnes & Noble were off 6 percent in the second quarter. (Here are the two-year stock charts of Borders and Barnes & Noble.) Books like these are a godsend for retailers—especially when hardcover books are the only available format. For highly motivated buyers who don't frequent bookstores, an electronic version is the best option, since it offers instant gratification. The next-best thing is to show up at a store and purchase it. Buying the actual book online from Amazon means you still have to wait a couple of days. So, the theory goes, a Sarah Barracuda fan who needs Going Rogue badly will drive over to the B. Dalton (owned by Barnes & Noble) in the Karcher Mall in Nampa, Idaho, and, while there, also pick up a copy of Glenn Beck's latest. Meanwhile, a Camelot nostalgist in need of a fix will take the T to the Borders on Boylston Street in Boston and buy True Compass—and perhaps a coffee and sandwich.
Then there's the matter of price, which is a bone of contention between publishers and the Kindle portion of Amazon's business. The Kennedy ($35 retail) and Palin ($29 retail) memoirs are expensive books. Most hardcovers these days have sticker prices in the mid-$20s. But Amazon prices most Kindle offerings at $9.99. As my colleague and former editor Marion Maneker notes, book editors believe that over time, the existence of low-priced new books on Kindle will make it difficult for them to charge premium prices for books in stores. And so, out of anger or as part of an attempt to preserve the higher price points of hot books, publishers withhold e-versions for certain books they know will sell huge numbers in print. (Adam Clymer's biography of Kennedy isn't available on the Kindle, either.)
Why isn't Amazon.com livid about this? After all, this technology firm is providing the beleaguered publishing industry a more efficient way to reach readers, and it's being stiffed on some big sellers. It may be that Amazon is losing money on many sales it makes of Kindle-ready books. With the Kindle, Amazon has inverted the old business model of giving away the shaver and selling the blades. Amazon is using the blades (cheap books, in this case) as a loss leader to induce people to pay up for the shaver (the $299 Kindle). As I understand it, Amazon pays the same wholesale price for Kindle books as it does for real books—generally 50 percent of the list price. For a typical hardback that retails for $26—say, E.L. Doctorow's Homer & Langley—Amazon pays $13 and then sells it for $9.99 on the Kindle, taking a $3 loss on each sale. (The longer-term strategy, publishers fear, is that once the Kindle gains significant market share, Amazon will negotiate lower wholesale prices for digital versions.) In the short term, though, this means that Amazon is likely to lose more money on more expensive books sold on the Kindle. It would have to pay $17.50 per "copy" of the digital version of True Compass, and $14.50 per copy for Going Rogue,but would sell them for significantly less. It may seem perverse, but once Amazon has sold a Kindle to a customer, it doesn't have all that much incentive to sell expensive books to the Kindle owner—unless it's willing to boost the prices of electronic books significantly.
And so this arrangement seems to work for all parties—except for Kindle owners. Publishers land a blow in the fight to maintain the integrity of their pricing scheme. Booksellers find that eager buyers have a reason to visit their stores. And Amazon is racking up big profits selling the books the old-fashioned way. As I write, the hardcover editions of True Compass and Going Rogue are No. 5 and No. 3 on Amazon's best-seller list.
TODAY IN SLATE
Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case
The Jarring Experience of Watching White Americans Speak Frankly About Race
How Facebook’s New Feature Could Come in Handy During a Disaster
The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented
Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada
You Should Be Able to Sell Your Kidney
Or at least trade it for something.
- Texas Lab Worker on Cruise Tests Negative for Ebola as Dallas Hospital Apologizes
- Police Use Tear Gas to Break Up College Pumpkin Festival Turned Violent
- Racist Rancher Cliven Bundy Challenges Eric Holder in Bizarre Campaign Ad
- Supreme Court Allows Texas Law That Accepts Handgun Permits but not College IDs to Vote
An All-Female Mission to Mars
As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.