A nasty new PSA.

Advertising deconstructed.
Jan. 16 2006 3:42 PM

In Cold Blood

A nasty new public service announcement from the American Red Cross.

The Spot: A young guy delivers a monologue. "When I found out my jeans were made using child labor in sweatshops," he begins, "I wrote a letter to the company saying, 'Reconsider your labor practices.' " He goes on to tell a convoluted tale about his efforts to change the world—and how they are thwarted at every turn. Ultimately, he argues, his attempts to stop child labor will—in an indirect fashion—eradicate the rain forest, kill off indigenous tribes, and impede cancer research. A tag line fades in: "Saving the world isn't easy. Saving a life is. Just one pint of blood can save up to three lives. Give blood." (Click here to see the spot.)

Most charity ads are boring, treacly guilt trips. (Here is an African orphan. Notice his jutting ribs. He smiles weakly. A fly lands on his eyeball. Shouldn't you send him money?)

Seth Stevenson Seth Stevenson

Seth Stevenson is a frequent contributor to Slate. He is the author of Grounded: A Down to Earth Journey Around the World.


By contrast, this blood-donation PSA is a slick piece of marketing. It's got jumpy edits, extreme close-ups, and some unexpectedly vibrant imagery. We see split-second shots of, among other things: time-lapse forest growth, microscopic organisms, dimly lit sweatshops, and boxing chimpanzees. The monologue is cleverly written, too, reducing a complex narrative into a couple of funny, run-on sentences.

This ad's most effective tactic, though, is to draw a parallel between giving blood and "saving the world." You can do good both ways, the PSA suggests. But consider the difference: Giving blood is easy, it's over before you know it, and it's a tangible way to help people. On the other hand, social agitation (staging protests, organizing boycotts, writing letters to big corporations) can have complicated consequences, and the results can be difficult to quantify. Seems like a simple choice!

Before I go further, I should note that I approve of the greater cause here. Blood has a brief shelf life (only 42 days, according to the campaign's press release), and the national supply needs to be constantly replenished. No doubt, it would be terrific if more young people gave blood.

That said, this ad is a bit insidious. Since when do charities bash the competition? Imagine a spot arguing that Ethiopian orphans are more worthy than Somali orphans. That tsunami victims are more worthy than Katrina victims. Wouldn't happen. Yet this ad argues that giving blood is a better choice than advocating on behalf of those child laborers. It presents do-gooding as a zero-sum game.

In doing so, I think it takes its cues from classic consumer-marketing strategy. It's a ploy you've seen in thousands of ads for detergent, only this time, "Brand X" is progressive activism.

This is a horribly unfair comparison. Blood donation is just a maintenance measure. It may save lives, but it won't make the world a better place (as some activists' efforts have). And while it's a fairly unassailable act of good will, even giving blood can be tainted by political vicissitudes. Some students have protested against the Red Cross because gay men (a "risk" group) are not permitted to donate. (You can view the complete eligibility guidelines at the Red Cross Web site.)

Grade: C+. This campaign could backfire. Young people might resent being told to give up and do the easy thing. And actually, the Red Cross (one of the three major blood banks behind this campaign) handily illustrates how the easy choice can sometimes be the wrong one. After both Sept. 11 and Hurricane Katrina, the American public poured its money into the Red Cross' coffers. ($1.8 billion of the total $2.96 billion given after Katrina went to the Red Cross.) Giving to the Red Cross is straightforward, and easy, and it seems—just like giving blood—an unassailable act. But the way the Red Cross handled all that money, after both disasters, came under fire, and Red Cross President Marsha J. Evans recently resigned in the wake of the unfavorable scrutiny.

So kids, keep on saving the world—even if it's hard. And when you get a chance, throw a blood drive, too.



The World’s Politest Protesters

The Occupy Central demonstrators are courteous. That’s actually what makes them so dangerous.

The Religious Right Is Not Happy With Republicans  

The XX Factor
Oct. 1 2014 4:58 PM The Religious Right Is Not Happy With Republicans  

The Feds Have Declared War on Encryption—and the New Privacy Measures From Apple and Google

The One Fact About Ebola That Should Calm You

It spreads slowly.

These “Dark” Lego Masterpieces Are Delightful and Evocative


Operation Backbone

How White Boy Rick, a legendary Detroit cocaine dealer, helped the FBI uncover brazen police corruption.


Talking White

Black people’s disdain for “proper English” and academic achievement is a myth.

Activists Are Trying to Save an Iranian Woman Sentenced to Death for Killing Her Alleged Rapist

Piper Kerman on Why She Dressed Like a Hitchcock Heroine for Her Prison Sentencing

  News & Politics
Oct. 1 2014 7:26 PM Talking White Black people’s disdain for “proper English” and academic achievement is a myth.
Oct. 1 2014 2:16 PM Wall Street Tackles Chat Services, Shies Away From Diversity Issues 
Oct. 1 2014 6:02 PM Facebook Relaxes Its “Real Name” Policy; Drag Queens Celebrate
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 1 2014 5:11 PM Celebrity Feminist Identification Has Reached Peak Meaninglessness
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 1 2014 3:24 PM Revelry (and Business) at Mohonk Photos and highlights from Slate’s annual retreat.
Brow Beat
Oct. 1 2014 9:39 PM Tom Cruise Dies Over and Over Again in This Edge of Tomorrow Supercut
Future Tense
Oct. 1 2014 6:59 PM EU’s Next Digital Commissioner Thinks Keeping Nude Celeb Photos in the Cloud Is “Stupid”
  Health & Science
Oct. 1 2014 4:03 PM Does the Earth Really Have a “Hum”? Yes, but probably not the one you’re thinking.
Sports Nut
Oct. 1 2014 5:19 PM Bunt-a-Palooza! How bad was the Kansas City Royals’ bunt-all-the-time strategy in the American League wild-card game?